Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36362493›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Explainable Preoperative Automated Machine Learning Prediction Model for Cardiac Surgery-Associated Acute Kidney Injury.

Charat Thongprayoon, Pattharawin Pattharanitima, Andrea G Kattah, Michael A Mao, Mira T Keddis, John J Dillon, Wisit Kaewput, Supawit Tangpanithandee, Pajaree Krisanapan, Fawad Qureshi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Charat ThongprayoonDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Pattharawin PattharanitimaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-6010-0033
Andrea G KattahDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Michael A MaoDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1814-7003
Mira T KeddisDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8249-0848
John J DillonDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Wisit KaewputDepartment of Military and Community Medicine, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-2920-7235
Supawit TangpanithandeeDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6103-2338
Pajaree KrisanapanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-2888-881X
Fawad QureshiDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Wisit CheungpasitpornDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9954-9711

Funding

Mayo Clinic and nference AI Challenge Award 21-004248
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe aimed to develop and validate an automated machine learning (autoML) prediction model for cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury (CSA-AKI).

methodsUsing 69 preoperative variables, we developed several models to predict post-operative AKI in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Models included autoML and non-autoML types, including decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and artificial neural network (ANN), as well as a logistic regression prediction model. We then compared model performance using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and assessed model calibration using Brier score on the independent testing dataset.

resultsThe incidence of CSA-AKI was 36%. Stacked ensemble autoML had the highest predictive performance among autoML models, and was chosen for comparison with other non-autoML and multivariable logistic regression models. The autoML had the highest AUROC (0.79), followed by RF (0.78), XGBoost (0.77), multivariable logistic regression (0.77), ANN (0.75), and DT (0.64). The autoML had comparable AUROC with RF and outperformed the other models. The autoML was well-calibrated. The Brier score for autoML, RF, DT, XGBoost, ANN, and multivariable logistic regression was 0.18, 0.18, 0.21, 0.19, 0.19, and 0.18, respectively. We applied SHAP and LIME algorithms to our autoML prediction model to extract an explanation of the variables that drive patient-specific predictions of CSA-AKI.

conclusionWe were able to present a preoperative autoML prediction model for CSA-AKI that provided high predictive performance that was comparable to RF and superior to other ML and multivariable logistic regression models. The novel approaches of the proposed explainable preoperative autoML prediction model for CSA-AKI may guide clinicians in advancing individualized medicine plans for patients under cardiac surgery.

Indexed as

acute kidney injuryAKIartificial intelligencecardiac surgerycardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injuryindividualized medicinemachine learningpersonalized medicinepreoperative

Identifiers

PMID36362493
PMCPMC9656700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.