ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022
Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Standing, Sitting, and Supine Position: Comparison between Tono-Pen Avia and Icare Pro Tonometers.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Short-term intraocular pressure changes following intravitreal aflibercept 8 mg versus 2 mg in diabetic macular edema: a prospective observational study.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
- Speculum-Induced Intraocular Pressure Elevation During Cataract Surgery and Its Association with Axial Length: A Retrospective Clinical Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Intraocular pressure measurement in keratoconus: a narrative review.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Comparison of Ocular Wavefront in Seated and Supine Positions Using a Hand-Held Hartmann-Shack Aberrometer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Biometric Factors in the VRF-G Formula for IOL Power Calculation.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Effect of Various Body and Head Positions on Intraocular Pressure in Cataract Patients With Limited Mobility.Journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Standing, Sitting, Prone, and Supine Positions.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Intraocular Pressure Changes in Non-Surgical Eyes of Patients Admitted for Glaucoma Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- The Effect of Esophagogastroduodenoscopy on Intraocular Pressure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Reporting Quality of Glaucoma Randomized Controlled Trial Abstracts: Current Status and Future Perspectives.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A comparison of intraocular pressure measurement using SUOER SW-500 rebound tonometer and conventional reusable Goldmann prisms.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Effect of 0.01% atropine combined with orthokeratology lens on axial elongation: a 2-year randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Intraocular Pressure Variations in Postural Changes: Comparison between Obese and Non-Obese Controls.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Bibliometric and visualized analysis of myopic corneal refractive surgery research: from 1979 to 2022.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Herbal and Natural Treatments for the Management of the Glaucoma: An Update.BioMed research international · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Intraocular pressure (IOP) is influenced by body position. The purpose of this study is to compare the IOP measurements obtained with two different devices, to investigate IOP changes in standing, sitting, and supine positions. Methods: In this comparative prospective case series, IOP was measured in sitting, supine, prone, and standing (standing 1) positions and again five minutes after standing (standing 2), utilizing an Icare Pro (ICP) and a Tono-Pen Avia (TPA) in the 64 eyes of 32 healthy subjects. Results: Compared to the sitting position, both devices showed an increase in the IOP both in supine and standing 2 positions (p < 0.05). The mean IOP difference between the two devices was: in the sitting position, 0.57 ± 2.10 mmHg (range: −3.80 to 6.60 mmHg) (p < 0.05), in the supine position, 0.93 ± 2.49 mmHg (range: −4.50 to 7.10 mmHg) (p < 0.05), in the standing 1 position, 0.37 ± 1.96 mmHg (range: −5.20 to 5.00 mmHg) (p = 0.102), and in the standing 2 position 0.73 ± 2.03 mmHg (range: −4.5 to 6.4 mmHg) (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The results highlight an agreement between the TPA and ICP, both confirming not only the increase in IOP in the supine position, but also showing an increase in the standing 2 position. Therefore, it is suggested to perform such measurements in patients with glaucoma, to explain its progression in an apparently normal tension or in compensated patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.