ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022
PollenDetect: An Open-Source Pollen Viability Status Recognition System Based on Deep Learning Neural Networks.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of Meiotic Behavior and 2n Pollen Formation Frequency in Triploid Hybrids of Chinese Jujube.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- PollenNet: A novel architecture for high precision pollen grain classification through deep learning and explainable AI.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Deep learning-based high-throughput detection of in vitro germination to assess pollen viability from microscopic images.Journal of experimental botany · 2023Article
- Methodologies and Considerations in Evaluating Heat Stress Response and Thermotolerance of Pollen Grains.Physiologia plantarumReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pollen grains, the male gametophytes for reproduction in higher plants, are vulnerable to various stresses that lead to loss of viability and eventually crop yield. A conventional method for assessing pollen viability is manual counting after staining, which is laborious and hinders high-throughput screening. We developed an automatic detection tool (PollenDetect) to distinguish viable and nonviable pollen based on the YOLOv5 neural network, which is adjusted to adapt to the small target detection task. Compared with manual work, PollenDetect significantly reduced detection time (from approximately 3 min to 1 s for each image). Meanwhile, PollenDetect can maintain high detection accuracy. When PollenDetect was tested on cotton pollen viability, 99% accuracy was achieved. Furthermore, the results obtained using PollenDetect show that high temperature weakened cotton pollen viability, which is highly similar to the pollen viability results obtained using 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium formazan quantification. PollenDetect is an open-source software that can be further trained to count different types of pollen for research purposes. Thus, PollenDetect is a rapid and accurate system for recognizing pollen viability status, and is important for screening stress-resistant crop varieties for the identification of pollen viability and stress resistance genes during genetic breeding research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.