Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36362167›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Synthesis and Evaluation of a Chitosan-Silica-Based Bone Substitute for Tissue Engineering.

María I Alvarez Echazú, Sandra J Renou, Gisela S Alvarez, Martín F Desimone, Daniel G Olmedo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. TurningBiomedicines · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

María I Alvarez EchazúFacultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Junín 956, Piso 3°, Buenos Aires C1113AAD, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0001-9955-9493
Sandra J RenouFacultad de Odontología, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Cátedra de Anatomía Patológica, Marcelo T de Alvear 2142, Piso 2A, Buenos Aires C1122AAH, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0001-7907-6152
Gisela S AlvarezFacultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Junín 956, Piso 3°, Buenos Aires C1113AAD, Argentina.
Martín F DesimoneFacultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Junín 956, Piso 3°, Buenos Aires C1113AAD, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-0571-7962
Daniel G OlmedoFacultad de Odontología, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Cátedra de Anatomía Patológica, Marcelo T de Alvear 2142, Piso 2A, Buenos Aires C1122AAH, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-2084-6973

Funding

National Agency for the Promotion of Science and Technology PICT 2017- 0806School of Dentistry of the University of Buenos Aires FOUBA Res. (CD) N°330/19-01University of Buenos Aires UBACYT 20020190100148BA, UBACYT 20020150100056BA and PIDAE 2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone defects have prompted the development of biomaterial-based bone substitutes for restoring the affected tissue completely. Although many biomaterials have been designed and evaluated, the combination of properties required in a biomaterial for bone tissue engineering still poses a challenge. In this study, a chitosan-silica-based biocomposite was synthetized, and its physicochemical characteristics and biocompatibility were characterized, with the aim of exploring the advantages and drawbacks of its use in bone tissue engineering. Dynamic light scattering measurements showed that the mean hydrodynamic size of solid silica particles (Sol-Si) was 482 ± 3 nm. Scanning electron microscopy of the biocomposite showed that Sol-Si were homogenously distributed within the chitosan (CS) matrix. The biocomposite swelled rapidly and was observed to have no cytotoxic effect on the [3T3] cell line within 24 h. Biocompatibility was also analyzed in vivo 14 days post-implant using a murine experimental model (Wistar rats). The biocomposite was implanted in the medullary compartment of both tibiae (

Indexed as

Bone SubstitutesChitosanAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsMiceRatsRats, WistarSilicon DioxideTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible MaterialsBone SubstitutesChitosanSilicon Dioxidebiocompositebone tissue engineeringchitosanmurine experimental modelsilica

Identifiers

PMID36362167
PMCPMC9657383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.