Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36362093›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Comparison of EMT-Related and Multi-Drug Resistant Gene Expression, Extracellular Matrix Production, and Drug Sensitivity in NSCLC Spheroids Generated by Scaffold-Free and Scaffold-Based Methods.

Xiaoli Qi, Alexandra V Prokhorova, Alexander V Mezentsev, Ningfei Shen, Alexander V Trofimenko, Gleb I Filkov, Rushan A Sulimanov, Vladimir A Makarov, Mikhail O Durymanov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Barrier Function of the Extracellular Matrix in AAV Gene Therapy.Cellular and molecular bioengineering · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Beyond monolayers: a comparative analysis of 2D cell cultures and 3DFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xiaoli QiSchool of Biological and Medical Physics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, National Research University, 141701 Dolgoprudny, Russia.
Alexandra V ProkhorovaSchool of Biological and Medical Physics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, National Research University, 141701 Dolgoprudny, Russia.
Alexander V MezentsevSchool of Biological and Medical Physics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, National Research University, 141701 Dolgoprudny, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4972-9922
Ningfei ShenSchool of Biological and Medical Physics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, National Research University, 141701 Dolgoprudny, Russia.
Alexander V TrofimenkoSchool of Biological and Medical Physics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, National Research University, 141701 Dolgoprudny, Russia.
Gleb I FilkovSchool of Biological and Medical Physics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, National Research University, 141701 Dolgoprudny, Russia.
Rushan A SulimanovMedical Informatics Laboratory, Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University, 173003 Veliky Novgorod, Russia.
Vladimir A MakarovMedical Informatics Laboratory, Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University, 173003 Veliky Novgorod, Russia.
Mikhail O DurymanovSchool of Biological and Medical Physics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, National Research University, 141701 Dolgoprudny, Russia.

Funding

The Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation 075-15-2022-306
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multicellular 3D tumor models are becoming a powerful tool for testing of novel drug products and personalized anticancer therapy. Tumor spheroids, a commonly used 3D multicellular tumor model, more closely reproduce the tumor microenvironment than conventional 2D cell cultures. It should be noted that spheroids can be produced using different techniques, which can be subdivided into scaffold-free (SF) and scaffold-based (SB) methods. However, it remains unclear, to what extent spheroid properties depend on the method of their generation. In this study, we aimed to carry out a head-to-head comparison of drug sensitivity and molecular expression profile in SF and SB spheroids along with a monolayer (2D) cell culture. Here, we produced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) spheroids based on human lung adenocarcinoma cell line A549. Drug sensitivity analysis of the tested cell cultures to five different chemotherapeutics resulted in IC50 (A549-SB) > IC50 (A549-SF) > IC50 (A549-2D) trend. It was found that SF and SB A549 spheroids displayed elevated expression levels of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers and proteins associated with drug resistance compared with the monolayer A549 cell culture. Enhanced drug resistance of A549-SB spheroids can be a result of larger diameters and elevated deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM) that impairs drug penetration into spheroids. Thus, the choice of the spheroid production method can influence the properties of the generated 3D cell culture and their drug resistance. This fact should be considered for correct interpretation of drug testing results.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorDrug ResistanceExtracellular MatrixGene ExpressionHumansSpheroids, CellularTumor Microenvironment3D cell cultureanticancer drugscytotoxicityextracellular matrixtumor spheroids

Identifiers

PMID36362093
PMCPMC9657250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.