Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36362088›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Analysis of Korean Pine Cell Lines with Different Somatic Embryogenic Potential.

Chunxue Peng, Fang Gao, Iraida Nikolaevna Tretyakova, Alexander Mikhaylovich Nosov, Hailong Shen, Ling Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chunxue PengState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China.
Fang GaoState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China.
Iraida Nikolaevna TretyakovaLaboratory of Forest Genetics and Breeding, V.N. Sukachev Institute of Forest, Siberian Branch of RAS, Krasnoyarsk 660036, Russia.
Alexander Mikhaylovich NosovDepartment of Cell Biology, Institute of Plant Physiology K.A. Timiryazev, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 127276, Russia.
Hailong ShenState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China.
Ling YangState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9669-3216

Funding

the Innovation Project of State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding 2021B01the National Key R&D Program of China 2017YFD0600600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The embryogenesis capacity of conifer callus is not only highly genotype-dependent, but also gradually lost after long-term proliferation. These problems have seriously limited the commercialization of conifer somatic embryogenesis (SE) technology. In this study, the responsive SE cell line (R-EC), the blocked SE cell line (B-EC), and the loss of SE cell line (L-EC) were studied. The morphological, physiological, transcriptomic, and metabolomic profiles of these three types of cells were analyzed. We found that R-EC had higher water content, total sugar content, and putrescine (Put) content, as well as lower superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity and H

Indexed as

PinusTracheophytaCell LineEmbryonic DevelopmentFlavonoidsGene Expression Regulation, PlantHydrogen PeroxidePlant Somatic Embryogenesis TechniquesRepublic of KoreaSugarsTranscriptomeFlavonoidsHydrogen PeroxideSugarsKorean pinemetabolomesomatic embryogenic potentialtranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID36362088
PMCPMC9658236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.