ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022
Integrative Genomic Tests in Clinical Oncology.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Detecting homologous recombination deficiency for breast cancer through integrative analysis of genomic data.Molecular oncology · 2025Article
- Clinical benefit of additional whole-exome sequencing over panel sequencing in an all-comer real-world molecular tumor board.ESMO open · 2025Article
- Overview on biomarkers for immune oncology drugs.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2025Review
- Targeting of TAMs: can we be more clever than cancer cells?Cellular & molecular immunology · 2024Review
- Integrating Bulk and Single-Cell RNA-Seq Data to Identify Prognostic Features Related to Activated Dendritic Cells in Clear-Cell Renal-Cell Carcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Functional analysis and validation of oncodrive gene AP3S1 in ovarian cancer through filtering of mutation data from whole-exome sequencing.European journal of medical research · 2024Article
- Agnostic Administration of Targeted Anticancer Drugs: Looking for a Balance between Hype and Caution.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Multi-omics pan-cancer analyses identify MCM4 as a promising prognostic and diagnostic biomarker.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Advancing precision oncology through systematic germline and tumor genetic analysis: The oncogenetic point of view on findings from a prospective multicenter clinical trial of 666 patients.Cancer medicine · 2023Observational
- Clinical characterization and genomic landscape of gynecological cancers among patients attending a Chinese hospital.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Proteasome inhibitors in medullary thyroid carcinoma: time to restart with clinical trials?Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
- The Clinical and Genetic Landscape of Hereditary Cancer: Experience from a Single Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory.Cancer genomics & proteomicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many clinical decisions in oncology practice rely on the presence or absence of an alteration in a single genetic locus, be it a pathogenic variant in a hereditary cancer gene or activating mutation in a drug target. In addition, there are integrative tests that produce continuous variables and evaluate complex characteristics of the entire tumor genome. Microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis identifies tumors with the accumulation of mutations in short repetitive nucleotide sequences. This procedure is utilized in Lynch syndrome diagnostic pipelines and for the selection of patients for immunotherapy. MSI analysis is well-established for colorectal malignancies, but its applications in other cancer types lack standardization and require additional research. Homologous repair deficiency (HRD) indicates tumor sensitivity to PARP inhibitors and some cytotoxic drugs. HRD-related "genomic scars" are manifested by a characteristic pattern of allelic imbalances, accumulation of deletions with flanking homology, and specific mutation signatures. The detection of the genetic consequences of HRD is particularly sophisticated and expensive, as it involves either whole genome sequencing (WGS) or the utilization of large next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels. Tumor mutation burden (TMB) can be determined by whole exome sequencing (WES) or middle-throughput NGS multigene testing. Although TMB is regarded as an agnostic indicator of tumor sensitivity to immunotherapy, the clinical utility of this test is proven only for a few cancer types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.