Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36361765›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Addressing Noise and Estimating Uncertainty in Biomedical Data through the Exploration of Chemical Space.

Enrique J deAndrés-Galiana, Juan Luis Fernández-Martínez, Lucas Fernández-Brillet, Ana Cernea, Andrzej Kloczkowski

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Enrique J deAndrés-GalianaGroup of Inverse Problems, Optimization and Machine Learning, Department of Mathematics, University of Oviedo, C/Federico García Lorca, 18, 33007 Oviedo, Spain.
Juan Luis Fernández-MartínezGroup of Inverse Problems, Optimization and Machine Learning, Department of Mathematics, University of Oviedo, C/Federico García Lorca, 18, 33007 Oviedo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4758-2832
Lucas Fernández-BrilletDeepBioInsights, C/Federico García Lorca, 18, 33007 Oviedo, Spain.
Ana CerneaGroup of Inverse Problems, Optimization and Machine Learning, Department of Mathematics, University of Oviedo, C/Federico García Lorca, 18, 33007 Oviedo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8890-6429
Andrzej KloczkowskiThe Steve and Cindy Rasmussen Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children Hospital, Columbus, OH 43205, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1002-5095
Universidad de Oviedo · ESThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

Novel Use of Genome Information to Understand MutationsR01HG012117 · NHGRI · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JERNIGAN, ROBERT L, KLOCZKOWSKI, ANDRZEJ · 2021 to 2025
$2.3M
Protein Sequence MatchingR01GM127701 · NIGMS · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JERNIGAN, ROBERT L, KLOCZKOWSKI, ANDRZEJ · 2018 to 2021
$1.4M
National Science Foundation DBI1661391NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG012117NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM127701NIH HHS R01 GM127701NIH HHS R01HG012117
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Noise is a basic ingredient in data, since observed data are always contaminated by unwanted deviations, i.e., noise, which, in the case of overdetermined systems (with more data than model parameters), cause the corresponding linear system of equations to have an imperfect solution. In addition, in the case of highly underdetermined parameterization, noise can be absorbed by the model, generating spurious solutions. This is a very undesirable situation that might lead to incorrect conclusions. We presented mathematical formalism based on the inverse problem theory combined with artificial intelligence methodologies to perform an enhanced sampling of noisy biomedical data to improve the finding of meaningful solutions. Random sampling methods fail for high-dimensional biomedical problems. Sampling methods such as smart model parameterizations, forward surrogates, and parallel computing are better suited for such problems. We applied these methods to several important biomedical problems, such as phenotype prediction and a problem related to predicting the effects of protein mutations, i.e., if a given single residue mutation is neutral or deleterious, causing a disease. We also applied these methods to de novo drug discovery and drug repositioning (repurposing) through the enhanced exploration of huge chemical space. The purpose of these novel methods that address the problem of noise and uncertainty in biomedical data is to find new therapeutic solutions, perform drug repurposing, and accelerate and optimize drug discovery, thus reestablishing homeostasis. Finding the right target, the right compound, and the right patient are the three bottlenecks to running successful clinical trials from the correct analysis of preclinical models. Artificial intelligence can provide a solution to these problems, considering that the character of the data restricts the quality of the prediction, as in any modeling procedure in data analysis. The use of simple and plain methodologies is crucial to tackling these important and challenging problems, particularly drug repositioning/repurposing in rare diseases.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDrug RepositioningDrug DiscoveryPhenotypeUncertaintyartificial intelligencedrug designdrug discoverynoise and uncertaintyphenotype prediction

Identifiers

PMID36361765
PMCPMC9656407
OpenAlexW4307551178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.