Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36361677›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Patient-Derived Multiple Myeloma 3D Models for Personalized Medicine-Are We There Yet?

Diana Lourenço, Raquel Lopes, Carolina Pestana, Ana C Queirós, Cristina João, Emilie Arnault Carneiro

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. A 3D engineered multiple myeloma niche for evaluating CAR T cell therapy.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. A 3D-Printable Cell Array for In Vitro Breast Cancer Modeling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Advance in the application of organoids in bone diseases.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Selenylated Imidazo [1,2-Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Diana LourençoMyeloma Lymphoma Research Group-Champalimaud Experimental Clinical Research Programme of Champalimaud Foundation, 1400-038 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9761-1398
Raquel LopesMyeloma Lymphoma Research Group-Champalimaud Experimental Clinical Research Programme of Champalimaud Foundation, 1400-038 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2378-6192
Carolina PestanaMyeloma Lymphoma Research Group-Champalimaud Experimental Clinical Research Programme of Champalimaud Foundation, 1400-038 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8421-6965
Ana C QueirósMyeloma Lymphoma Research Group-Champalimaud Experimental Clinical Research Programme of Champalimaud Foundation, 1400-038 Lisbon, Portugal.
Cristina JoãoMyeloma Lymphoma Research Group-Champalimaud Experimental Clinical Research Programme of Champalimaud Foundation, 1400-038 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3978-766X
Emilie Arnault CarneiroMyeloma Lymphoma Research Group-Champalimaud Experimental Clinical Research Programme of Champalimaud Foundation, 1400-038 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5235-6557
Champalimaud Foundation · PT

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia PTDC/MED-ONC/1215/2021/PT
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the wide variety of existing therapies, multiple myeloma (MM) remains a disease with dismal prognosis. Choosing the right treatment for each patient remains one of the major challenges. A new approach being explored is the use of ex vivo models for personalized medicine. Two-dimensional culture or animal models often fail to predict clinical outcomes. Three-dimensional ex vivo models using patients' bone marrow (BM) cells may better reproduce the complexity and heterogeneity of the BM microenvironment. Here, we review the strengths and limitations of currently existing patient-derived ex vivo three-dimensional MM models. We analyze their biochemical and biophysical properties, molecular and cellular characteristics, as well as their potential for drug testing and identification of disease biomarkers. Furthermore, we discuss the remaining challenges and give some insight on how to achieve a more biomimetic and accurate MM BM model. Overall, there is still a need for standardized culture methods and refined readout techniques. Including both myeloma and other cells of the BM microenvironment in a simple and reproducible three-dimensional scaffold is the key to faithfully mapping and examining the relationship between these players in MM. This will allow a patient-personalized profile, providing a powerful tool for clinical and research applications.

Indexed as

Multiple MyelomaAnimalsBone Marrow CellsModels, BiologicalPrecision MedicineTumor Microenvironment3D modelsbone marrow microenvironmentex vivo modelshematologic cancermultiple myelomapersonalized therapyprimary cell culture

Identifiers

PMID36361677
PMCPMC9657251
OpenAlexW4307549506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.