ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022
Computer-Aided Diagnosis by Tissue Image Analysis as an Optical Biopsy in Hysteroscopy.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence, Deep Learning, and Computer Vision in Hysteroscopy: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Quantitative Assessment of Polarization and Elastic Properties of Endometrial Tissue for Precancer/Cancer Diagnostics Using Multimodal Optical Coherence Tomography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Malignancy in Abdominal Wall Endometriosis: Is There a Way to Avoid It? A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- It is time to implement molecular classification in endometrial cancer.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review of our experience in computer-assisted tissue image analysis (CATIA) research shows that significant information can be extracted and used to diagnose and distinguish normal from abnormal endometrium. CATIA enabled the evaluation and differentiation between the benign and malignant endometrium during diagnostic hysteroscopy. The efficacy of texture analysis in the endometrium image during hysteroscopy was examined in 40 women, where 209 normal and 209 abnormal regions of interest (ROIs) were extracted. There was a significant difference between normal and abnormal endometrium for the statistical features (SF) features mean, variance, median, energy and entropy; for the spatial grey-level difference matrix (SGLDM) features contrast, correlation, variance, homogeneity and entropy; and for the gray-level difference statistics (GLDS) features homogeneity, contrast, energy, entropy and mean. We further evaluated 52 hysteroscopic images of 258 normal and 258 abnormal endometrium ROIs, and tissue diagnosis was verified by histopathology after biopsy. The YCrCb color system with SF, SGLDM and GLDS color texture features based on support vector machine (SVM) modeling correctly classified 81% of the cases with a sensitivity and a specificity of 78% and 81%, respectively, for normal and hyperplastic endometrium. New technical and computational advances may improve optical biopsy accuracy and assist in the precision of lesion excision during hysteroscopy. The exchange of knowledge, collaboration, identification of tasks and CATIA method selection strategy will further improve computer-aided diagnosis implementation in the daily practice of hysteroscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.