Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36361466›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Returning to Leisure Activity Post-Stroke: Barriers and Facilitators to Engagement.

Joanna Harrison, Clare Thetford, Matthew J Reeves, Christopher Brown, Miland Joshi, Caroline Watkins

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Effectiveness of Rehabilitation Interventions on Improving Leisure Participation Following Stroke: A Systematic Review.The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joanna HarrisonSynthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS), Applied Health Research hub (AHRh), University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8963-7240
Clare ThetfordStroke Research Team, Faculty of Health and Care, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK.
Matthew J ReevesUCLan Research Centre for Sport, Physical Activity & Performance, Faculty of Allied Health and Wellbeing, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3903-2910
Christopher BrownLancashire Clinical Trials Unit, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK.
Miland JoshiLancashire Clinical Trials Unit, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7263-7252
Caroline WatkinsStroke Research Team, Faculty of Health and Care, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9403-3772
University of Lancashire · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo identify barriers and facilitators to engagement when returning to, or participating in, leisure activity post-stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA).

designSequential explanatory, mixed methods study.

setting21 hospital sites across England, Wales and Northern Ireland.

participantsAdults with a clinical diagnosis of first/recurrent stroke or TIA. Patients approaching end of life were excluded. Participants were recruited as in-patients or at first clinic appointment and a baseline questionnaire was completed. A 6-month follow-up questionnaire was sent to participants for self-completion. Open-text questions were asked about barriers and facilitators when returning to, or participating in, leisure activity. Responses were thematically analysed and explored by participant characteristics, including type of leisure activity undertaken. Characteristics also included measures of socioeconomic deprivation, mood, fatigue and disability.

results2000 participants returned a 6-month follow-up questionnaire (78% stroke, 22% TIA); 1045 participants responded to a question on barriers and 820 on facilitators. Twelve themes were identified and the proportion of responses were reported (%). Barriers: physical difficulties (69%), lower energy levels (17%), loss of independence (11%), psychological difficulties (10%), hidden disabilities (7%), and delay or lack of healthcare provision (3%). Facilitators: family support (35%), healthcare support (27%), well-being and fitness (22%), friendship support (20%), self-management (19%), and returning to normality (9%). 'Physical difficulties' was the most reported barrier across all participant characteristics and activity types. Family support was the most reported facilitator except for those with greater disability, where it was healthcare support and those without fatigue where it was well-being and exercise.

conclusionsPhysical difficulties and lack of energy are problematic for stroke and TIA survivors who want to return to or participate in leisure activity. Healthcare support alone cannot overcome all practical and emotional issues related to leisure activity engagement. Family support and improving well-being are important facilitators and future research should explore these mechanisms further.

Indexed as

Ischemic Attack, TransientStrokeStroke RehabilitationAdultFatigueHumansLeisure ActivitiesQualitative Researchengagementleisure activityqualitativestrokeTIA

Identifiers

PMID36361466
PMCPMC9657985
OpenAlexW4308447119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.