Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36361441›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Laser Er:YAG-Assisted Debonding May Be a Viable Alternative to the Conventional Method for Monocrystalline Ceramic Brackets.

Daliana-Emanuela Mocuta, Mariana I Miron, Diana Lungeanu, Marius Mateas, Emilia Ogodescu, Carmen D Todea

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daliana-Emanuela MocutaDepartment of Oral Rehabilitation and Dental Emergencies, Faculty of Dentistry, Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Eftimie Murgu Square No. 2, 300041 Timișoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-8674-9973
Mariana I MironDepartment of Oral Rehabilitation and Dental Emergencies, Faculty of Dentistry, Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Eftimie Murgu Square No. 2, 300041 Timișoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-4904-0885
Diana LungeanuCenter for Modeling Biological Systems and Data Analysis, Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-0274-1377
Marius MateasMechatronics Department, Polytechnic University of Timișoara, 300006 Timișoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-1991-4457
Emilia OgodescuPediatric Dentistry Research Center, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Eftimie Murgu Square No. 2, 300041 Timișoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-1863-2263
Carmen D TodeaDepartment of Oral Rehabilitation and Dental Emergencies, Faculty of Dentistry, Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Eftimie Murgu Square No. 2, 300041 Timișoara, Romania.
Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara · ROPolytechnic University of Timişoara · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In orthodontic practice, due to the increased interest among patients in smile aesthetics, different types of brackets are now being used, with those most frequently applied being ones made of polycrystalline and monocrystalline ceramic. The aim of this study was to evaluate the laser Er:YAG-assisted debonding technique compared to conventional methods for removing monocrystalline ceramic brackets from human teeth. The study sample included 60 vital teeth (frontals of the upper jaw) from 10 patients who had monocrystalline ceramic brackets and were in the final phase of orthodontic treatment. The debonding procedure was carried out following a split-mouth study design, using either the conventional technique or laser Er:YAG 2940 nm radiation. For each tooth, three variables were evaluated: the patient's sujective tooth sensitivity associated with the debonding, the time required for debonding, and pulp blood flow microdynamics after the debonding. Three evaluation instruments were used to assess and quantify the treatment effects: (i) the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale for pain assessment; (ii) a digital stopwatch/timer to measure the time required to remove the bracket; and (iii) laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) for recording the pulp blood flow evolution. The statistical analysis of the recorded data showed a statistically significant difference between the two debonding methods regarding the tooth sensitivity during the debonding and the time required for the procedure. The subjective tooth sensitivity was reduced from a mean ± standard deviation of 3.07 ± 1.46 to 0.47 ± 0.86 on the Wong-Baker FACES scale (Wilcoxon signed rank,

Indexed as

Dentin SensitivityLasers, Solid-StateOrthodontic BracketsCeramicsHumansdebondinglaser Doppler flowmetrylaser Er:YAGmonocrystalline ceramic brackets

Identifiers

PMID36361441
PMCPMC9657488
OpenAlexW4308582369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.