ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022
Implementation and Effectiveness of a Pharmacotherapeutic Follow-Up Service for People with Tuberculosis in Primary Healthcare.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of the impact of Comprehensive Medication Management on health outcomes in people living with hypertension: a pragmatic clinical trial.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Implementation of Clinical Pharmacy Services in Primary Health Care: A Scoping Review.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025Article
- Can we involve pharmacists as direct service providers for people with tuberculosis? A narrative review of current evidence.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2025Review
- Pharmacists' Role in Global TB Elimination: Practices, Pitfalls, and Potential.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Impact of pharmaceutical care interventions in improving clinical outcomes among patients with pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2024Review
- Multidisciplinary tuberculosis care: leveraging the role of hospital pharmacists.BMJ open respiratory research · 2023Article
- Implications Derived from Global Experiences of Barriers to Integrating Community Pharmacists into Primary Healthcare: A Scoping Review.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB) is a disease of great relevance, responsible for 1.5 million deaths worldwide. Therefore, actions to control TB are necessary, and pharmacists may play an important role, especially in primary healthcare (PHC), where the diagnosis and management of this infection occurs. In a large Brazilian city, pharmacotherapeutic follow-up in PHC has been offered by pharmacists to people with TB since 2018. The objective of this study was to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of this service though a longitudinal type 1 effectiveness-implementation hybrid study. Data were collected from January 2018 to February 2020 in the pharmaceutical services system. The service indicators were described and effectiveness was evaluated using Poisson regression analysis to compare the incidence of cure among patients using and not using the service. The service was performed in 148 PHC units by 82 pharmacists. Of the total of 1076 treatments, 721 were followed up by pharmacists, and TB was cured more frequently in these cases (90.4% attended vs. 73.5% unattended). The adjusted hazard ratio of cure among patients enrolled in the pharmacotherapeutic follow-up service was 2.71 (2.04-3.61;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.