Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36361386›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Restorative Effects from Green Exposure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials.

Song Song, Ruoxiang Tu, Yao Lu, Shi Yin, Hankun Lin, Yiqiang Xiao

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Urban greenspace and dementia: Measures, mechanisms, and methodological guidance.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Review
  6. The Influence of Deep Space and the Stars on Emotions.International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Song SongState Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7618-5692
Ruoxiang TuSchool of Architecture, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4371-6191
Yao LuState Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China.
Shi YinState Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5825-5749
Hankun LinSchool of Architecture and Urban Planning, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5441-5178
Yiqiang XiaoState Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite growing research on green space and health benefits, the body of evidence remains heterogeneous and unclear. A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with high evidence levels are deemed timely. We searched Scopus, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for the literature up to January 2022 and assessed bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0. We calculated joint impact estimates for each green space exposure assessment technique using random and fixed effects models. Compared to non-green space situations, green space exposure was related to decreased negative feelings, such as fatigue -0.84 (95% CI: -1.15 to -0.54), and increased levels of pleasant emotions, such as vitality 0.85 (95% CI: 0.52 to 1.18). It also lowered physiological indicators, including heart rate levels, by 0.60 (95% CI: -0.90 to -0.31). Effect sizes were large and statistically significant, and the overall quality of the evidence was good. Existing RCTs on greenspace exposure pay insufficient attention to older and adolescent populations, different ethnic groups, different regions, and doses of greenspace exposure interventions. More research is needed to understand how and how much green space investment has the most restorative benefits and guide urban green space planning and renewal.

Indexed as

FatigueAdolescentHeart RateHumansgreen spacemental healthmeta-analysisrandomized controlled trialsrestorative benefit

Identifiers

PMID36361386
PMCPMC9658851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.