Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36361383›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

On Serendipitous Campus Meetings: A User Survey.

Sascha Naomi Jansz, Mark Mobach, Terry van Dijk, Esther de Vries, Roeland van Hout

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Serendipity in medical education.GMS journal for medical education · 2025
    Article
  2. The 5-Minute Campus.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sascha Naomi JanszDepartment of Spatial Planning and Environment, Faculty of Spatial Sciences, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, 9712 CP Groningen, The Netherlands.
Mark MobachResearch Group Facility Management, Research Centre for Built Environment-NoorderRuimte, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, 9747 AS Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1490-4540
Terry van DijkDepartment of Spatial Planning and Environment, Faculty of Spatial Sciences, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, 9712 CP Groningen, The Netherlands.
Esther de VriesTranzo, Tilburg School for Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4311-3550
Roeland van HoutCentre for Language Studies, Radboud University, 6500 HD Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With campuses opening up and stimulating interactions among different campus users more and more, we aim to identify the characteristics of successful meeting places (locations) on campus. These can help practitioners such as campus managers and directors to further optimize their campus to facilitate unplanned or serendipitous meetings between academic staff and companies. A survey on three Dutch campuses, including questions on both services and locations, was analyzed both spatially and statistically using principal component (PC) and regression analysis. Four PCs were found for services (Relax, Network, Proximity and Availability) and three PCs were found for locations (Aesthetics, Cleaned and Indoor Environment). Personal characteristics as explanatory variables were not significant or only had very small effect sizes, indicating that a campus' design does not need to be tailored to certain user groups but can be effective for all. The pattern of successful locations is discussed, including the variables in each PC. These PCs provide a framework for practitioners who want to improve their campus' design to further facilitate unplanned meetings, thus contributing to cooperation between campus users, hopefully leading to further innovation.

Indexed as

UniversitiesHumansSurveys and Questionnairescampus designinteractionsserendipityservicesspacesunplanned meetings

Identifiers

PMID36361383
PMCPMC9655170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.