Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36361180›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

How Do Landscape Heterogeneity, Community Structure, and Topographical Factors Contribute to the Plant Diversity of Urban Remnant Vegetation at Different Scales?

Xingzhao Liu, Guimei Yang, Qingmin Que, Qi Wang, Zengke Zhang, Liujing Huang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Does Increasing Farm Plot Size Influence the Visual Quality of Everyday Agricultural Landscapes?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Xingzhao LiuCollege of Landscape Architecture and Art, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3538-1953
Guimei YangCollege of Landscape Architecture and Art, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China.
Qingmin QueCollege of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agriculture University, Guangzhou 510642, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1833-1644
Qi WangSchool of Modern Agriculture and Environment, Weifang Institute of Technology, Weifang 262500, China.
Zengke ZhangSchool of Ecological and Environmental Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China.
Liujing HuangCollege of Landscape Architecture and Art, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China.
Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University · CNEast China Normal University · CNMinistry of Natural Resources · CNSouth China Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In highly fragmented urban areas, plant diversity of remnant vegetation may depend not only on community structure and topographical factors, but also on landscape heterogeneity. Different buffer radius settings can affect the relative importance of these factors to plant diversity. The aim of this study was to examine the relative importance of landscape heterogeneity, community structure, and topographical factors on plant diversity under different buffer radii in biodiversity hotspots. We established 48 plots of remnant vegetation in Guangzhou city, one of the biodiversity hotspots. A buffer radius of 500 m, 1000 m, and 2000 m was established around the center of each sample plot, and 17 landscape heterogeneity indices in each buffer were calculated by FRAGSTATS 4.2 software. Combined with the community structure and topographical factors, the impact factors of plant diversity under different buffer radii were analyzed by multiple regression analysis. We found the following: (1) The combined explanatory power of the three factors accounted for 43% of the species diversity indices and 62% of the richness index at its peak. The three impact factors rarely act independently and usually create comprehensive cumulative effects. (2) Scale does matter in urban landscape studies. At a 500 m buffer radius, community structure combined with road disturbance indices was strongly related to diversity indices in herb and shrub layers. The stand age was negatively correlated with the tree-layer richness index. As the scale increased, the diversity indices and richness index in the three layers decreased or increased under the influence of comprehensive factors. (3) The richness index in the herb layer was more responsive to impact factors than other biodiversity indices. Except for the herb layer, the interpretation of landscape heterogeneity for each plant diversity index was more stable than that for the other two factors. Road disturbance indices, combined with the other six landscape pattern metrics, can well indicate species diversity and richness. We suggest that the vegetation area of remnant patches within a radius of 500-2000 m should be appropriately increased to protect plant diversity, and the negative effects of road disturbance should also be considered.

Indexed as

BiodiversityEcosystemCitiesPlantsbuffer radiuscommunity structurediversitylandscape pattern metricsrichnesstopographic

Identifiers

PMID36361180
PMCPMC9658405
OpenAlexW4308124610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.