Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36361160›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Analysis of the Face Mask Use by Public Transport Passengers and Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Ekaterina A Shashina, Ekaterina A Sannikova, Denis V Shcherbakov, Yury V Zhernov, Valentina V Makarova, Tatiana S Isiutina-Fedotkova, Nadezhda N Zabroda, Elena V Belova, Nina A Ermakova, Tatiana M Khodykina and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effect of Face Masking on Transmission of SARS-CoV-2.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ekaterina A ShashinaDepartment of General Hygiene, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5294-6813
Ekaterina A SannikovaNational Medical Research Center for Urology, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4092-0034
Denis V ShcherbakovDepartment of General Hygiene, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-0226-9276
Yury V ZhernovDepartment of General Hygiene, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-8734-5527
Valentina V MakarovaDepartment of General Hygiene, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7213-4265
Tatiana S Isiutina-FedotkovaDepartment of General Hygiene, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Nadezhda N ZabrodaDepartment of General Hygiene, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Elena V BelovaDepartment of General Hygiene, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2134-6348
Nina A ErmakovaDepartment of General Hygiene, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9745-4265
Tatiana M KhodykinaDepartment of General Hygiene, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9646-5595
Anton Yu SkopinDepartment of General Hygiene, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Vitaly A SukhovDepartment of General Hygiene, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-2993-0108
Anna A KlimovaDepartment of General Hygiene, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8939-9315
Tamara Nikolic TurnicDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-7107-9962
Irina I YakushinaN.A. Semashko Department of Public Health and Healthcare, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6818-0840
Olga A ManerovaN.A. Semashko Department of Public Health and Healthcare, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1660-9414
Vladimir A ReshetnikovN.A. Semashko Department of Public Health and Healthcare, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Oleg V MitrokhinDepartment of General Hygiene, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6403-0423
Sechenov University · RUUniversity of Kragujevac · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: The use of face masks and gloves in public places directly shows the commitment of the population to the established regulations. Public transport is one of the most-at-risk places of contamination. The aim of the study was to analyze the face mask use by public transport passengers and workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. (2) Methods: Public transport passengers and workers were surveyed. Periodic intermittent selective observation was used to gauge the level of adherence to the established regulations among public transport passengers. Factor analysis was used to identify factors determining the face-mask-wearing comfort. (3) Results: The majority of passengers (87.5%) and all transport workers (100%) used face masks and gloves. Most of the users wore only face masks. Only 41.6% of passengers and 74.7% of transport workers wore face masks correctly. Motivational attitudes at the implementation of preventive measures were determined: established regulations in the public place (55.8%) and the protection of one's own health and the health of family members (44.2%). Only 22.5% of those wearing face masks believed that doing so will have any effect on the spread of an infectious disease, and 10.8% wore masks to maintain the health of people around themselves. A low level of social responsibility was demonstrated. For 53.4% of workers, face mask wearing was uncomfortable. The majority of workers had adverse reactions to mask wearing: feeling short of breath (52.8%), hyperemia of face skin (33.8%), and facial hyperhidrosis (67.4%). (4) Conclusions: The comfort of wearing a mask is determined by adverse reactions occurrence, the properties of the mask, working conditions, and the duration of wearing the face mask. It is necessary to develop recommendations to reduce wearing discomfort. These recommendations, along with methods of raising the social responsibility of the population, can contribute to a greater commitment of the population to non-specific prevention measures.

Indexed as

COVID-19MasksHumansPandemicsSurveys and QuestionnairesTransportationadverse reactions to mask wearingface maskmotivational attitudespassengerssocial responsibilitytransport workers

Identifiers

PMID36361160
PMCPMC9657969
OpenAlexW4307922015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.