ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022
Patient Involvement in Shared Decision-Making: Do Patients Rate Physicians and Nurses Differently?
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Robotic Single Anastomosis Duodenal-ileal Bypass With Sleeve Gastrectomy (SADI-S) for Morbid Obesity: A Systematic Review.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Pooled it
- The Readability of Patient-Facing Information in Public Reporting System: Cross-Sectional Evaluation of the City of Helsinki Website.Online journal of public health informatics · 2026Article
- Emicizumab and shared medical decision in patients living with hemophilia A.Hematology, transfusion and cell therapy · 2026Article
- Patient Participation in Decision-Making During Nursing Care: A Relational Autonomy Perspective.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Surgical patients' awareness about their diagnosis and management plans in Ethiopia: cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Global trends and thematic evolution of nursing in liver cancer: a bibliometric analysis of the web of science core collection (1944-2025).Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Exploring Patient Experiences of Symptom Support From Healthcare Professionals in Acute and Chronic Illness: A Qualitative Study.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences · 2026Article
- User Involvement in Transition Care in Virtual 4-Party Meetings: A Qualitative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Living With Chronic Rhinosinusitis: Insights From an Arts-Based Study.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2026Article
- Assessing the Critical Thinking and Training Needs of Healthcare Professionals, and Patient Experiences: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study in Primary Care of Crete, Greece.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Navigating guidelines and realities: informed free choice in infant feeding for people living with HIV.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
- A Quality Improvement Study on Patient-Perceived Participation in Care Decisions at a Comprehensive Stroke Center Using a Standardized Patient Information Tool.Journal of patient experience · 2026Article
- The Approach of Shared Decision-Making as a Factor in Improving the Quality of Care.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Article
- Self-Reflective Chest X-Ray Report Generation with Clinical-Aware Detection and Multilevel Readability.Journal of medical systems · 2025Article
- Transition readiness among Chinese adolescents with chronic diseases: the promoting role of self-efficacy and willingness to engage in healthcare.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Implementation of Clinical Practice Guidelines to Prevent Cervical Cancer: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR cancer · 2025Article
- Article
- Insights of shared decision-making and personalized treatment in orthopedics - A qualitative systematic review.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025Article
- A comparative study of Palestinian patient satisfaction with service quality in accredited government and private hospitals in the West bank.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Quality of post-abortion care services in the greater Accra region: connecting the perspectives of service providers and experiences of clients.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundShared decision-making implies that patients and healthcare professionals make decisions together about clinical exams, available treatments, choice of options, and the benefit or downside of every choice. Patients involved in the shared decision-making process are more compliant with treatments and have a reduced risk of complications related to the pathology. In Italy, patient involvement in caring processes is still barely investigated.
aimTo investigate patients' perceptions about shared decision-making with physicians and nurses, respectively, and to examine the relationship between shared decision-making and patient satisfaction and perceived quality of care/treatment.
methodsThe study was performed between March and June 2019 in two wards of one Italian hospital. A questionnaire was administered to inpatients at the time of admission and again at discharge, including demographic information and measurement scales regarding patient involvement in shared decision-making, patient satisfaction, and perceived quality of treatment/care.
resultsA total of 151 out of 301 patients completed questionnaires at both admission and discharge. Patients' scores for shared decision-making (information, patient needs, treatment planning) were significantly different for physicians and nurses. At both admission and discharge, patients rated shared decision-making significantly higher for physicians compared to nurses, while there were no differences in their satisfaction ratings. Patient ratings of physicians did not change from admission (information: mean (M) = 3.50, standard deviation (SD) = 0.81; patient need: M = 3.05, SD = 1.05; treatment planning: M = 2.75, SD = 1.23) to discharge (information: M = 3.50, SD = 0.79; patient need: M = 3.17, SD = 1.02; treatment planning: M = 2.66, SD = 1.23) ( DISCUSSION: Nurses should be sensitized to involving patients in the decision-making process, especially upon hospital admission. Specific training about effective communication techniques can be implemented to manage relationships with patients in different caring situations. Practical implications and future directions are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.