Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36361082›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Restoring Coal Mining-Affected Areas: The Missing Ecosystem Services.

Alicja Krzemień, Juan José Álvarez Fernández, Pedro Riesgo Fernández, Gregorio Fidalgo Valverde, Silverio Garcia-Cortes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alicja KrzemieńDepartment of Extraction Technologies, Rockburst and Risk Assessment, Central Mining Institute, 40166 Katowice, Poland.
Juan José Álvarez FernándezSchool of Mining, Energy and Materials Engineering, University of Oviedo, 33004 Oviedo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0141-1915
Pedro Riesgo FernándezSchool of Mining, Energy and Materials Engineering, University of Oviedo, 33004 Oviedo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6504-0378
Gregorio Fidalgo ValverdeSchool of Mining, Energy and Materials Engineering, University of Oviedo, 33004 Oviedo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7106-5747
Silverio Garcia-CortesPolytechnic School of Mieres, University of Oviedo, 33600 Mieres, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5695-1268

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multi-criteria decision analysis and cost-benefit analysis, either individually or in combination, have been used as the preferred tools to develop ecosystem services valuation, presenting significant discrepancies and variations between the calculated values. To counteract this problem, a new framework was developed based on a hierarchical weighting of the non-provisioning ecosystem services, using biodiversity as the reference ecosystem service since it is the easiest to apprehend. Their monetisation was made using the average price of EU carbon dioxide emission allowances during 2019 and 2020, obtaining reasonable and comparable results in line with what was expected for the study region. However, the revised EU Emissions Trading System Directive, which will apply from 2021-2030, generated a price escalation of carbon allowances, making it necessary to adjust or rethink the proposed framework. To achieve this goal, the paper proposes the introduction of new vectors or "missing ecosystem services" to counterbalance efforts to eliminate carbon dioxide emissions without necessarily removing humans from the equation: welfare and human health. As the linkages regarding ecosystem health, ecological restoration and human health are not well known, only welfare was incorporated into the framework. The results were highly satisfactory, in line with what was expected for the study region and the ones obtained before the price escalation of carbon allowances that started in 2021.

Indexed as

Coal MiningEcosystemBiodiversityCarbon DioxideConservation of Natural ResourcesHumansCarbon Dioxidecarbon allowancescoal miningecosystem servicespeople-centered ecologismRECOVERY projectrestorationvaluation

Identifiers

PMID36361082
PMCPMC9655276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.