Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36361039›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Community Concern about the Health Effects of Pollutants: Risk Perception in an Italian Geothermal Area.

Elisa Bustaffa, Olivia Curzio, Fabrizio Bianchi, Fabrizio Minichilli, Daniela Nuvolone, Davide Petri, Giorgia Stoppa, Fabio Voller, Liliana Cori

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elisa BustaffaUnit of Environmental Epidemiology and Disease Registries, Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, Via Moruzzi 1, 56123 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1601-033X
Olivia CurzioUnit of Environmental Epidemiology and Disease Registries, Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, Via Moruzzi 1, 56123 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0784-302X
Fabrizio BianchiUnit of Environmental Epidemiology and Disease Registries, Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, Via Moruzzi 1, 56123 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3459-9301
Fabrizio MinichilliUnit of Environmental Epidemiology and Disease Registries, Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, Via Moruzzi 1, 56123 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0007-4731
Daniela NuvoloneUnit of Epidemiology, Regional Health Agency of Tuscany, Via Pietro Dazzi 1, 50141 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7480-762X
Davide PetriUnit of Epidemiology, Regional Health Agency of Tuscany, Via Pietro Dazzi 1, 50141 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3690-4007
Giorgia StoppaUnit of Epidemiology, Regional Health Agency of Tuscany, Via Pietro Dazzi 1, 50141 Florence, Italy.
Fabio VollerUnit of Epidemiology, Regional Health Agency of Tuscany, Via Pietro Dazzi 1, 50141 Florence, Italy.
Liliana CoriUnit of Environmental Epidemiology and Disease Registries, Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, Via Moruzzi 1, 56123 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3070-2535

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Geothermal fluids for electricity and heat production have long been exploited in the Mt. Amiata area (Tuscany, Italy). Public concern about the health impact of geothermal plants has been present from the outset. Several factors influence the way people perceive risk; therefore, the objective of the present research is to develop indicators of risk perception and assess indices differences in relation to some questionnaire variables. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in the Amiata area on 2029 subjects aged 18-77. From the questionnaire section about risk perception from environmental hazards, four indicators were developed and analysed. A total of 64% of the subjects considered the environmental situation to be acceptable or excellent, 32% serious but reversible, and 4% serious and irreversible; as the values of the various perception indicators increased, an upward trend was observed in the averages. Risk perception was higher among women and young people, and was associated with higher education. Those who smelled bad odours in their surroundings reported higher risk perception. Furthermore, risk perception was higher in four municipalities. The results represent the basis for further investigations to analyse the link among risk perception indicators, exposure parameters, and health status.

Indexed as

Environmental PollutantsAdolescentCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansItalyPerceptionRisk FactorsEnvironmental Pollutantscross-sectional studyenvironmental monitoringgeothermal arearisk communicationrisk perception

Identifiers

PMID36361039
PMCPMC9655741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.