Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36361008›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

The Occurrence of Stress, Illness Acceptance and the Quality of Life of Patients after Pacemaker Implantation.

Kamil Sikora, Agnieszka Wawryniuk, Robert Jan Łuczyk, Katarzyna Sawicka, Agnieszka Zwolak

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07343466 (Klinische Studie Zur Untersuchung Der Lebensqualität Und Des Einflusses Von Stress Auf Den Postoperativen Verlauf Von Patienten Nach Device-Implantation), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07343466 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Klinische Studie Zur Untersuchung Der Lebensqualität Und Des Einflusses Von Stress Auf Den Postoperativen Verlauf Von Patienten Nach Device-Implantation

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, EssenRan2025 to 2029Enrolled300ConditionsQuality of Life (QOL) and Impact of StressArmsSurvey using a questionnaire.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kamil SikoraDepartment of Internal Medicine and Internal Nursing, Chair of Preventive Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Lublin, Ul. Chodźki 7, 20-093 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0965-5172
Agnieszka WawryniukDepartment of Internal Medicine and Internal Nursing, Chair of Preventive Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Lublin, Ul. Chodźki 7, 20-093 Lublin, Poland.
Robert Jan ŁuczykDepartment of Internal Medicine and Internal Nursing, Chair of Preventive Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Lublin, Ul. Chodźki 7, 20-093 Lublin, Poland.
Katarzyna SawickaDepartment of Internal Medicine and Internal Nursing, Chair of Preventive Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Lublin, Ul. Chodźki 7, 20-093 Lublin, Poland.
Agnieszka ZwolakDepartment of Internal Medicine and Internal Nursing, Chair of Preventive Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Lublin, Ul. Chodźki 7, 20-093 Lublin, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pacemaker implantation improves the quality of life of most patients, especially in the initial period after implantation. It is necessary to measure the long-term quality of life and factors that can affect it-stress and illness acceptance. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of stress and illness acceptance on the quality of life of patients after pacemaker implantation. To obtain final conclusions, we performed a survey on a group of 100 patients with implanted pacemakers. Our survey consists of standardized research tools to check the quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF), perceived stress and ways to cope with it (PSS-10, mini-COPE) and acceptance of illness (AIS). The results of the study were summarized in a statistical analysis. At least a good quality of life was declared by more than half of the respondents [Me = 4; 95% PU (4, 4)]. The average result obtained by the respondents when converted to the STEN scale was six. The respondents were characterized by a moderate level of stress compared to the PSS-10 norms and it was related to the quality of life. Similar, statistically significant correlations were presented as mini-COPE and AIS results. Respondents were most likely to use acceptance strategies, active coping methods, when dealing with something else and planning. The rarest strategies were doing nothing and taking pharmaceuticals. The average score on the acceptance of illness scale was (M = 22.14; SD = 6.05), which is more than the result obtained by patients from the AIS normalization group. It shows that assessed patients after pacemaker implantation declare the general quality of life as good or higher. Additionally, this quality of life is closely related to stress levels, coping strategies and acceptance of illness, which shows us the importance of research in this area.

Indexed as

Pacemaker, ArtificialQuality of LifeAdaptation, PsychologicalHumansSurveys and Questionnairesartificial pacemakerbehaviorpsychological stressquality of life

Identifiers

PMID36361008
PMCPMC9657800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.