Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36360967›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Validity and Reliability of Criteria for Plantar Sensation Assessment Using Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament as a Clinically Usable Index.

Masami Nakamoto, Norio Ideguchi, Satoru Iwata, Shunsuke Tomita, Nao Morimoto, Shion Fukuda, Shintarou Kudo

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07412145 (How's Your Balance?), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07412145 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

How's Your Balance?

TypeobservationalSponsorRxFunction Inc.Ran2025 to 2028Enrolled1,000ConditionsBalance Assessment, Falls, Plantar SensationArmsNone AHT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Plantar sensation associates with gait instability in older adults.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  5. The foot in diabetes - a reminder of an ever-present risk.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Masami NakamotoInclusive Medical Science Research Institute, Morinomiya University of Medical Sciences, 1-26-16, Nanko-kita, Suminoe-ku, Osaka 559-8611, Japan.
Norio IdeguchiInclusive Medical Science Research Institute, Morinomiya University of Medical Sciences, 1-26-16, Nanko-kita, Suminoe-ku, Osaka 559-8611, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6903-6296
Satoru IwataGraduate School of Health Science, Morinomiya University of Medical Sciences, 1-26-16, Nanko-kita, Suminoe-ku, Osaka 559-8611, Japan.
Shunsuke TomitaGraduate School of Health Science, Morinomiya University of Medical Sciences, 1-26-16, Nanko-kita, Suminoe-ku, Osaka 559-8611, Japan.
Nao MorimotoGraduate School of Health Science, Morinomiya University of Medical Sciences, 1-26-16, Nanko-kita, Suminoe-ku, Osaka 559-8611, Japan.
Shion FukudaGraduate School of Health Science, Morinomiya University of Medical Sciences, 1-26-16, Nanko-kita, Suminoe-ku, Osaka 559-8611, Japan.
Shintarou KudoInclusive Medical Science Research Institute, Morinomiya University of Medical Sciences, 1-26-16, Nanko-kita, Suminoe-ku, Osaka 559-8611, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9483-1830
Morinomiya University of Medical Sciences · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is no standard clinically adaptable criterion for assessing plantar sensation for pre- and post-intervention comparisons. Studies using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments (SWMs) to investigate intervention effects on plantar sensation vary in procedure and do not consider measurement errors. This study aimed to develop a simple criterion using SWMs to assess plantar sensation, determine the measurement error range, and identify areas of low error. Six examiners assessed 87 healthy young adults in Experiment 1, while two examiners assessed 10 participants in Experiment 2. Filaments were graded from 1 to 20 based on increasing diameter. The smallest grade that could be perceived for three sequential stimuli was used as the criterion (smallest perceivable grade, SPG). The SPG was significantly smaller at the hallux and larger at the heel than at other sites. There were no significant differences between the SPG of the repeated tests performed by the same versus different examiners. The interquartile range of the differences was <±3 at all sites. Thus, our criteria were reliable in evaluating the effects of plantar sensation interventions, especially at the heel and the middle of the metatarsal heads and could contribute to the development of more effective treatments for plantar sensations.

Indexed as

HeelSensationHumansReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adultclinically usable indexplantar assessmentreliabilitySemmes–Weinstein monofilamentsvalidity

Identifiers

PMID36360967
PMCPMC9656000
OpenAlexW4307610198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.