Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36360885›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis in Germany from a Health Economic View-A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

Arim Shukri, Thomas Mettang, Benjamin Scheckel, Isabell Schellartz, Dusan Simic, Nadine Scholten, Martin Müller, Stephanie Stock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Arim ShukriInstitute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology (IGKE), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany.
Thomas MettangKidney Center Wiesbaden, 65189 Wiesbaden, Germany.
Benjamin ScheckelInstitute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology (IGKE), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany.
Isabell SchellartzInstitute of Health Care Research, Rhineland State Council, 51109 Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4678-7609
Dusan SimicInstitute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology (IGKE), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany.
Nadine ScholtenInstitute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), Faculty of Human Sciences and Medicine, University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany.
Martin MüllerInstitute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology (IGKE), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4067-7174
Stephanie StockInstitute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology (IGKE), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1726-9300

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) are deemed medically equivalent for therapy of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and reimbursed by the German statutory health insurance (SHI). However, although the home dialysis modality PD is associated with higher patient autonomy than HD, for unknown reasons, PD uptake is low in Germany. Hence, we compared HD with PD regarding health economic outcomes, particularly costs, as potentially relevant factors for the predominance of HD.

methodsClaims data from two German health insurance funds were analysed in a retrospective cohort study regarding the prevalence of HD and PD in 2013-2016. Propensity score matching created comparable HD and PD groups (

resultsTotal direct annual average costs were higher for HD (€47,501) than for PD (€46,235), but not significantly (

conclusionsPD has a slight non-significant cost advantage over HD, especially when considering transportation costs.

Indexed as

Kidney Failure, ChronicPeritoneal DialysisHumansPropensity ScoreRenal DialysisRetrospective Studiesclaims datacostsESRDGerman statutory health insurancehemodialysisperitoneal dialysispropensity score

Identifiers

PMID36360885
PMCPMC9653857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.