Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36360859›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Adoption of Improved Reprocessing Decreased Microbiological Non-Compliance for Bronchoscopes.

Benedetta Tuvo, Michela Scarpaci, Tommaso Cosci, Alessandro Ribechini, Silvia Briani, Grazia Luchini, Michele Totaro, Angelo Baggiani, Maria Luisa Cristina, Simona Barnini and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Benedetta TuvoDepartment of Translational Research and the New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Michela ScarpaciDepartment of Translational Research and the New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Tommaso CosciDepartment of Translational Research and the New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Alessandro RibechiniThoracic Endoscopy Division, University Hospital of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Silvia BrianiHospital Management, University Hospital of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Grazia LuchiniHospital Management, University Hospital of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Michele TotaroDepartment of Translational Research and the New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Angelo BaggianiDepartment of Translational Research and the New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Maria Luisa CristinaDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genova, Via Pastore 1, 16132 Genova, Italy.
Simona BarniniMicrobiology Unit, University Hospital of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Simone LeonettiDepartment of Life Science, School of Advanced Studies Sant'Anna, 56124 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6860-8635
Beatrice CasiniDepartment of Translational Research and the New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3609-4419
University of Pisa · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana · ITScuola Superiore Sant'Anna · ITUniversity of Genoa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the past few decades, the inadequate reprocessing of bronchoscopes has been associated with several serious outbreaks caused by multidrug-resistant microorganisms. In this study we evaluated the improvement in the quality of reprocessing in a Bronchoscopy Unit (BU), after the introduction of a new procedure.

methodsIn 2019, observational and clinical audits were conducted in the BU. After the introduction of an improved procedure in 2020, a microbiological surveillance plan was implemented in 2021.

resultsIn 2019, 13 of 22 bronchoscopes (59%) resulted as non-compliant, 18% as high concern organisms (HCO) and 36.4% as high microbial count (≥100 CFU/all channels) and HCO. The most frequent microorganisms were

conclusionsThe adoption of an improved reprocessing procedure decreased the non-compliance of bronchoscopes, increasing the quality of the process and patient safety.

Indexed as

BronchoscopesCross InfectionDisinfectionEquipment ContaminationKlebsiella pneumoniaebronchoscopesendoscope reprocessingmicrobiological surveillanceNDM-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

Identifiers

PMID36360859
PMCPMC9656596
OpenAlexW4307634719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.