Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36360829›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Current Progress, Challenges and Perspectives in the Microalgal-Bacterial Aerobic Granular Sludge Process: A Review.

Qianrong Jiang, Honglei Chen, Zeding Fu, Xiaohua Fu, Jiacheng Wang, Yingqi Liang, Hailong Yin, Junbo Yang, Jie Jiang, Xinxin Yang and 3 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Qianrong JiangEcological Environment Management and Assessment Center, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China.
Honglei ChenEcological Environment Management and Assessment Center, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7157-6774
Zeding FuSchool of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha 410114, China.
Xiaohua FuEcological Environment Management and Assessment Center, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China.
Jiacheng WangEcological Environment Management and Assessment Center, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China.
Yingqi LiangEcological Environment Management and Assessment Center, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China.
Hailong YinEcological Environment Management and Assessment Center, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China.
Junbo YangEcological Environment Management and Assessment Center, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China.
Jie JiangEcological Environment Management and Assessment Center, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China.
Xinxin YangEcological Environment Management and Assessment Center, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China.
He WangEcological Environment Management and Assessment Center, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China.
Zhiming LiuDepartment of Biology, Eastern New Mexico University, Portales, NM 88130, USA.
Rongkui SuEcological Environment Management and Assessment Center, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9830-6176

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional wastewater treatment technologies have become increasingly inefficient to meet the needs of low-consumption and sustainable wastewater treatment. Researchers are committed to seeking new wastewater treatment technologies, to reduce the pressure on the environment caused by resource shortages. Recently, a microalgal-bacterial granular sludge (MBGS) technology has attracted widespread attention due to its high efficiency wastewater treatment capacity, low energy consumption, low CO

Indexed as

MicroalgaeWater PurificationBacteriaBioreactorsSewageWaste Disposal, FluidWastewaterSewageWastewaterenvironmental sustainabilitymicroalgal-bacterial granular sludgeresource recoverywastewater treatment

Identifiers

PMID36360829
PMCPMC9655209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.