Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36360788›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Ophthalmology Practice and Social Media Influences: A Patients Based Cross-Sectional Study among Social Media Users.

Hani B ALBalawi, Osama Alraddadi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hani B ALBalawiDivision of Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 47512, Saudi Arabia.
Osama AlraddadiOhud Hospital, Ministry of Health, Medina 41412, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many physicians consider social media a good tool for building their brands and attracting patients. However, limited data exist on patients' perceptions of the value of social media in ophthalmology. Therefore, our objective was to examine how social media influences patients when choosing an ophthalmologist among social media users, and people's behaviors toward ophthalmologists' social media accounts. This was a cross-sectional study including 1086 participants. Males represented 77.3% of the sample. The majority of the participants (71.3%) were aged between 25 and 54 years. Regarding social media sites frequently checked, Twitter ranked first (75.3%), followed by Snapchat (52.8%) and YouTube (48.7%). The majority (92.3%) used social media sites at all times of the day. Concerning the importance of ophthalmologists' social media sites, around 36.3% considered it either very or extremely important. As regards the important factors about an ophthalmologist's social media site from participants' perspectives, medical information written by the ophthalmologist (45.5%) and recommendations by friends (45.4%) were the most common reasons. Around 21% of females, compared to 16.8% of males, perceived the ophthalmologists' social media sites as extremely important,

Indexed as

OphthalmologistsOphthalmologySocial MediaAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adultbenefits of social mediaFacebookimportance of social mediaLinkedInophthalmologistspatientspracticesocial mediasocial networksTwitter

Identifiers

PMID36360788
PMCPMC9655030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.