Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36360756›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

WtsWrng Interim Comparative Effectiveness Evaluation and Description of the Challenges to Develop, Assess, and Introduce This Novel Digital Application in a Traditional Health System.

Laura Sampietro-Colom, Carla Fernandez-Barcelo, Ismail Abbas, Blanca Valdasquin, Nicolau Rabasseda, Borja García-Lorenzo, Miquel Sanchez, Mireia Sans, Noemi Garcia, Alicia Granados

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Laura Sampietro-ColomAssessment of Innovations and New Technologies Unit, Research and Innovation Directorate, Clínic Barcelona University Hospital, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7182-0231
Carla Fernandez-BarceloAssessment of Innovations and New Technologies Unit, Research and Innovation Directorate, Clínic Barcelona University Hospital, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5495-879X
Ismail AbbasAssessment of Innovations and New Technologies Unit, Research and Innovation Directorate, Clínic Barcelona University Hospital, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9172-9435
Blanca ValdasquinAssessment of Innovations and New Technologies Unit, Research and Innovation Directorate, Clínic Barcelona University Hospital, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Nicolau RabassedaMangrana Ventures S.L., 08006 Barcelona, Spain.
Borja García-LorenzoAssessment of Innovations and New Technologies Unit, Research and Innovation Directorate, Clínic Barcelona University Hospital, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6546-4186
Miquel SanchezEmergency Department, Clínic Barcelona University Hospital, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Mireia SansCAP Comte Borrell, Consorci Atenció Primaria Salut Barcelona Esquerra-CAPSBE, 08029 Barcelona, Spain.
Noemi GarciaCAP Comte Borrell, Consorci Atenció Primaria Salut Barcelona Esquerra-CAPSBE, 08029 Barcelona, Spain.
Alicia GranadosMangrana Ventures S.L., 08006 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0431-400X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Science and technology have evolved quickly during the two decades of the 21st century, but healthcare systems are grounded in last century's structure and processes. Changes in the way health care is provided are demanded; digital transformation is a key driver making healthcare systems more accessible, agile, efficient, and citizen-centered. Nevertheless, the way healthcare systems function challenges the development (Innovation + Development and regulatory requirements), assessment (methodological guidance weaknesses), and adoption of digital applications (DAs). WtsWrng (WW), an innovative DA which uses images to interact with citizens for symptom triage and monitoring, is used as an example to show the challenges faced in its development and clinical validation and how these are being overcome. To prove WW's value from inception, novel approaches for evidence generation that allows for an agile and patient-centered development have been applied. Early scientific advice from NICE (UK) was sought for study design, an iterative development and interim analysis was performed, and different statistical parameters (Kappa, B statistic) were explored to face development and assessment challenges. WW triage accuracy at cutoff time ranged from 0.62 to 0.94 for the most frequent symptoms attending the Emergency Department (ED), with the observed concordance for the 12 most frequent diagnostics at hospital discharge fluctuating between 0.4 to 0.97; 8 of the diagnostics had a concordance greater than 0.8. This experience should provoke reflective thinking for DA developers, digital health scientists, regulators, health technology assessors, and payers.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareTriageEmergency Service, HospitalHumansMedical AssistanceTechnologydigital applicationdigital healthinnovationmHealthtechnology assessmenttriageWtsWrng

Identifiers

PMID36360756
PMCPMC9654177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.