Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36360689›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Inland Waterways and Population Health and Wellbeing: A Cross-Sectional Study of Waterway Users in the UK.

Nafsika Afentou, Patrick Moore, Katrina Hull, Jenny Shepherd, Stephanie Elliott, Emma Frew

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nafsika AfentouHealth Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1337-7029
Patrick MooreHealth Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Katrina HullCanal & River Trust, Milton Keynes MK9 1BB, UK.
Jenny ShepherdCanal & River Trust, Milton Keynes MK9 1BB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0402-3264
Stephanie ElliottCanal & River Trust, Milton Keynes MK9 1BB, UK.
Emma FrewHealth Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5462-1158

Funding

Department of Health NIHR300440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural environments, such as inland waterways (IWs), have been identified as a potential means to increase physical activity and promote health and wellbeing. However, further information on predictors of IW usage and their relationship with health and wellbeing outcomes is needed. Data were taken from the cross-sectional UK Waterways Engagement Monitor survey of waterway users (n = 21,537) in 2019/2020. Health outcome measures were life satisfaction, physical activity, and mental wellbeing. Visit frequency was an additional outcome measure. Both bivariate and multivariable associations between outcome measures and features of IWs were explored. The travel-cost method was used to estimate users' demand, expressed by travel costs to waterways. Multivariable models showed positive associations of frequent visits and use for recreational/leisure purposes with life satisfaction and physical activity. Rural visits were associated with higher life satisfaction than urban ones. Lower visit satisfaction negatively impacted life satisfaction and mental wellbeing. Visit frequency was influenced by individual characteristics and purpose of visit, including visits for exercise. Waterway visits were inversely associated with travel costs (IRR = 0.99,

Indexed as

Health PromotionPopulation HealthCross-Sectional StudiesHumansLeisure ActivitiesUnited Kingdomblue spaceinland waterwayslife satisfactionmental wellbeingphysical activitytravel cost method

Identifiers

PMID36360689
PMCPMC9654601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.