Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Camille Marques AlvesAssistive Technology Laboratory (NTA), Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia 38400-902, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7509-1547
Andressa Rastrelo RezendeAssistive Technology Laboratory (NTA), Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia 38400-902, Brazil.
Isabela Alves MarquesLaboratoire de Conception, d'Optimisation et de Modélisation des Systèmes (LCOMS), Université de Lorraine, 57070 Metz, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5025-7328
Luanne Cardoso MendesLaboratoire de Conception, d'Optimisation et de Modélisation des Systèmes (LCOMS), Université de Lorraine, 57070 Metz, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7465-9332
Angela Abreu Rosa de SáAssistive Technology Laboratory (NTA), Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia 38400-902, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1818-8270
Marcus Fraga VieiraBioengineering and Biomechanics Laboratory (Labioeng), Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia 74690-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9096-1603
Edgard Afonso Lamounier JúniorComputer Graphics Laboratory (CG), Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia 38400-902, Brazil.
Adriano Alves PereiraCentre for Innovation and Technology Assessment in Health (NIATS), Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia 38400-902, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1522-9989
Fábio Henrique Monteiro OliveiraFederal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Brasília-Brasília Campus (IFB), Brasília 70830-450, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0344-5801
Luciane Pascucci Sande de SouzaApplied Physical Therapy Department, Federal University of Triangulo Mineiro, Uberaba 38025-180, Brazil.
Guy BourhisLaboratoire de Conception, d'Optimisation et de Modélisation des Systèmes (LCOMS), Université de Lorraine, 57070 Metz, France.
Pierre PinoLaboratoire de Conception, d'Optimisation et de Modélisation des Systèmes (LCOMS), Université de Lorraine, 57070 Metz, France.
Adriano de Oliveira AndradeCentre for Innovation and Technology Assessment in Health (NIATS), Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia 38400-902, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5689-6606
Yann MorèreLaboratoire de Conception, d'Optimisation et de Modélisation des Systèmes (LCOMS), Université de Lorraine, 57070 Metz, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2499-7576
Eduardo Lázaro Martins NavesAssistive Technology Laboratory (NTA), Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia 38400-902, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4175-723X
Funding
Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 88887.612297/2021-00Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 88887.628121/2021-01Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 88887.662002/2022-00Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior CAPES/COFECUB-88881.370894/2019-01Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior CAPES/DFATD-88887.159028/2017-00Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior MA957/20 2019-2023National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 304533/2020-3National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 304818/2018-6National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 307754/2020-0National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 309525/2021-7
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
(1) Background: One of the main cardinal signs of Parkinson's disease (PD) is rigidity, whose assessment is important for monitoring the patient's recovery. The wrist is one of the joints most affected by this symptom, which has a great impact on activities of daily living and consequently on quality of life. The assessment of rigidity is traditionally made by clinical scales, which have limitations due to their subjectivity and low intra- and inter-examiner reliability. (2) Objectives: To compile the main methods used to assess wrist rigidity in PD and to study their validity and reliability, a scope review was conducted. (3) Methods: PubMed, IEEE/IET Electronic Library, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, Bireme, Google Scholar and Science Direct databases were used. (4) Results: Twenty-eight studies were included. The studies presented several methods for quantitative assessment of rigidity using instruments such as force and inertial sensors. (5) Conclusions: Such methods present good correlation with clinical scales and are useful for detecting and monitoring rigidity. However, the development of a standard quantitative method for assessing rigidity in clinical practice remains a challenge.
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Wrist Rigidity Evaluation in Parkinson's Disease: A Scoping Review. · full record | OpenQuestion