ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Eye-Tracking-Based Analysis of Situational Awareness of Nurses.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A scalable method for characterizing visual search strategies: A novel application of time-series clustering to raw eye-tracking data.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Evaluating Eye Tracking Technology in Nursing Education: A Scoping Review on Medication Administration Training.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Review
- Application of eye-tracking in nursing research: A scoping review.Nursing open · 2024Article
- Assessing the Link between Nurses' Proficiency and Situational Awareness in Neonatal Care Practice Using an Eye Tracker: An Observational Study Using a Simulator.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNurses are responsible for comprehensively identifying patient conditions and associated environments. We hypothesize that gaze trajectories of nurses differ based on their experiences, even under the same situation.
methodsAn eye-tracking device monitored the gaze trajectories of nurses with various levels of experience, and nursing students during the intravenous injection task on a human patient simulator.
resultsThe areas of interest (AOIs) were identified in the recorded movies, and the gaze durations of AOIs showed different patterns between experienced nurses and nursing students. A state transition diagram visualized the recognition errors of the students and the repeated confirmation of the vital signs of the patient simulator. Clustering analysis of gaze durations also indicated similarity among the participants with similar experiences.
conclusionsAs expected, gaze trajectories differed among the participants. The developed gaze transition diagram visualized their differences and helped in interpreting their situational awareness based on visual perception. The demonstrated method can help in establishing an effective nursing education, particularly for learning the skills that are difficult to be verbalized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.