Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36360432›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2022

The Effects of a Physical Activity Online Intervention Program on Resilience, Perceived Social Support, Psychological Distress and Concerns among At-Risk Youth during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Michal Glaser, Gizell Green, Avi Zigdon, Sharon Barak, Gili Joseph, Adilson Marques, Kwok Ng, Itamar Erez-Shidlov, Lani Ofri, Riki Tesler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Evaluating the Tidda Talk Program: A Culturally Relevant Approach to Assessing Social and Emotional Wellbeing in Young Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Women.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michal GlaserDepartment of Health Systems Management, School of Health Sciences, Ariel University, Ariel 4077625, Israel.
Gizell GreenDepartment of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Ariel University, Ariel 4077625, Israel.
Avi ZigdonDepartment of Health Systems Management, School of Health Sciences, Ariel University, Ariel 4077625, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-1849-7206
Sharon BarakDepartment of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Ariel University, Ariel 4077625, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-0714-4798
Gili JosephDepartment of Physical Education, Faculty of Science, Seminar Kibbutzim College, Tel Aviv 6250769, Israel.
Adilson MarquesFaculdade de Motricidade Humana, Centro Interdisciplinar para o Estudo da Performance Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-004 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9850-7771
Kwok NgSchool of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Eastern Finland, 70211 Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-5461-7706
Itamar Erez-ShidlovDepartment of Physical Education, Wingate College, Netanya 4290200, Israel.
Lani OfriDepartment of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Ariel University, Ariel 4077625, Israel.
Riki TeslerDepartment of Health Systems Management, School of Health Sciences, Ariel University, Ariel 4077625, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-6070-6193

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 restrictions have led to social isolation affecting youth's health, particularly at-risk youth.

objectivesWe examined whether an online mentoring health intervention (OMHI) would strengthen characteristics that can prevent risky behaviors: resilience, perceived social support, psychological distress, and crisis concerns.

methodsFifty-six secondary-school students participated, 27 in the intervention group and 29 in the control group (mean age 16.18, SD 0.83 vs. 16.62, SD 0.82, respectively). The study took place between March and August 2020.

resultsThe intervention group was less resilient pre-test, with similar resilience levels as the control group post-test. Intervention group participants presented a significantly higher crisis level pre- and post-test than the control group, as well as an increase in resilience (effect size = 1.88) and social support (effect size = 1.22), while psychological distress significantly decreased (effect size = -1.03). Both groups (intervention vs. control) predicted changes from pre-to-post test for resilience and crisis (adjusted R

conclusionsOMHI participation was associated with improved resilience and social support, and decreased psychological distress, making it an effective strategy in health promotion for at-risk youth. An online intervention program combining mentoring in physical activity and interpersonal connections may constitute an effective health promotion strategy for at-risk youth, especially in times of crisis.

Indexed as

adolescents healthCOVID-19 pandemichealth promotiononline intervention programresiliencesocial support

Identifiers

PMID36360432
PMCPMC9688810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.