ArticleGenes2022
Cytogenetic Investigation of Infertile Patients in Hungary: A 10-Year Retrospective Study.
Article in Genes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic Yield of Phenotype-Guided Genetic Testing in Infertility: A Five-Year Retrospective Study from a Tertiary Referral Cohort.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Meiotic determinants of unbalanced gametogenesis in chromosomal inversion carriers.Journal of human genetics · 2026Article
- Prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities and polymorphisms in 4,672 infertile patients undergoing assisted reproductive techniques in the United Arab Emirates population.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
- Pericentric inversion in chromosome 2 and their fertility issues: three cases report and literature review.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2026Article
- Fertility problems in men carrying chromosome 7 inversion: A retrospective, observational study.Medicine · 2025Observational
- Genomic aspects in reproductive medicine.Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine · 2024Article
- Evaluation of chromosomal abnormalities in the postnatal cohort: A single-center study on 14,242 patients.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chromosome abnormalities play a crucial role in reproductive failure. The presence of numerical or structural aberrations may induce recurrent pregnancy loss or primary infertility. The main purpose of our study was to determine the types and frequency of chromosomal aberrations in infertile patients and to compare the frequency of structural aberrations to a control group. Karyotyping was performed in 1489 men and 780 women diagnosed with reproductive failure between 2010 and 2020. The control group included 869 male and 1160 female patients having cytogenetic evaluations for reasons other than infertility. Sex chromosomal aberrations were detected in 33/1489 (2.22%) infertile men and 3/780 (0.38%) infertile women. Structural abnormalities (e.g., translocation, inversion) were observed in 89/1489 (5.98%) infertile men and 58/780 (7.44%) infertile women. The control population showed structural chromosomal abnormalities in 27/869 (3.11%) men and 39/1160 (3.36%) women. There were significant differences in the prevalence of single-cell translocations between infertile individuals (males: 3.5%; females: 3.46%) and control patients (males: 0.46%; females: 0.7%). In summary, this is the first report of cytogenetic alterations in infertile patients in Hungary. The types of chromosomal abnormalities were comparable to previously published data. The prevalence of less-studied single-cell translocations was significantly higher in infertile patients than in the control population, supporting an earlier suggestion that these aberrations may be causally related to infertility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.