Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36360305›Full record

ReviewGenes2022

Population Genetics of the European Roma-A Review.

Giacomo Francesco Ena, Julen Aizpurua-Iraola, Neus Font-Porterias, Francesc Calafell, David Comas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Giacomo Francesco EnaDepartment of Medicine and Life Sciences (MELIS), Institute of Evolutionary Biology (CSIC-UPF), Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 08002 Barcelona, Spain.
Julen Aizpurua-IraolaDepartment of Medicine and Life Sciences (MELIS), Institute of Evolutionary Biology (CSIC-UPF), Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 08002 Barcelona, Spain.
Neus Font-PorteriasDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO 80309, USA.
Francesc CalafellDepartment of Medicine and Life Sciences (MELIS), Institute of Evolutionary Biology (CSIC-UPF), Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 08002 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1083-9438
David ComasDepartment of Medicine and Life Sciences (MELIS), Institute of Evolutionary Biology (CSIC-UPF), Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 08002 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5075-0956

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Roma are a group of populations with a common origin that share the Romani identity and cultural heritage. Their genetic history has been inferred through multiple studies based on uniparental and autosomal markers, and current genomic data have provided novel insights into their genetic background. This review was prompted by two factors: (i) new developments to estimate the genetic structure of the Roma at a fine-scale resolution have precisely identified the ancestral components and traced migrations that were previously documented only in historical sources, clarifying and solving debates on the origins and the diaspora of the Roma; (ii) while there has been an effort to review the health determinants of the Roma, the increasing literature on their population genetics has not been subjected to a dedicated review in the last two decades. We believe that a summary on the state of the art will benefit both the public and scholars that are approaching the subject.

Indexed as

Romani PeopleGenetics, PopulationHaplotypesHuman MigrationHumansbottleneckfounder eventgenetic structuregenomicspopulation geneticsRomani

Identifiers

PMID36360305
PMCPMC9690732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.