Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36360160›Full record

ArticleGenes2022

Genetic Hearing Loss Affects Cochlear Processing.

Cris Lanting, Ad Snik, Joop Leijendeckers, Arjan Bosman, Ronald Pennings

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cris LantingDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ad SnikDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Joop LeijendeckersDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Arjan BosmanDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5016-989X
Ronald PenningsDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5517-9683

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship between speech recognition and hereditary hearing loss is not straightforward. Underlying genetic defects might determine an impaired cochlear processing of sound. We obtained data from nine groups of patients with a specific type of genetic hearing loss. For each group, the affected cochlear site-of-lesion was determined based on previously published animal studies. Retrospectively obtained speech recognition scores in noise were related to several aspects of supra-threshold cochlear processing as assessed by psychophysical measurements. The differences in speech perception in noise between these patient groups could be explained by these factors and partially by the hypothesized affected structure of the cochlea, suggesting that speech recognition in noise was associated with a genetics-related malfunctioning of the cochlea. In particular, regression models indicate that loudness growth and spectral resolution best describe the cochlear distortions and are thus a good biomarker for speech understanding in noise.

Indexed as

DeafnessHearing LossSpeech PerceptionCochleaHumansRetrospective Studiesfrequency discriminationgap detectionhereditary hearing lossloudness growthotogeneticsspeech-in-noise

Identifiers

PMID36360160
PMCPMC9690229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.