ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Time-Resolved Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy for Accurate Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Brown Rice Flour Adulteration.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Special Issue "Advanced Spectroscopy Techniques in Food Analysis: Qualitative and Quantitative Chemometric Approaches".Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To solve the adulteration problem of brown rice flour in the commodity market, a novel, accurate, and stable detection method based on time-resolved laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (TR-LIBS) is proposed. Qualitative and quantitative analysis was used to detect five adulterants and seven different adulterant ratios in brown rice flour. Being able to excavate more information from plasma by obtaining time-resolved spectra, TR-LIBS has a stronger performance, which has been further verified by experiments. For the qualitative analysis of adulterants, the traditional machine learning models based on TR-LIBS, linear discriminant analysis (LDA), naïve Bayes (NB) and support vector machine (SVM) have significantly better classification accuracy than those based on traditional LIBS, increasing by 3-11%. The deep learning classification model based on TR-LIBS also achieved the same results, with an accuracy increase of more than 8%. For the quantitative analysis of the adulteration ratio, compared with traditional LIBS, the quantitative model based on TR-LIBS reduces the limit of detection (LOD) of five adulterants from about 8-51% to 4-19%, which effectively improves the quantitative detection performance. Moreover, t-SNE visualization proved that there were more obvious boundaries between different types of samples based on TR-LIBS. These results demonstrate the great prospect of TR-LIBS in the identification of brown rice flour adulteration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.