ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Metagenomics to Detect and Characterize Viruses in Food Samples at Genome Level? Lessons Learnt from a Norovirus Study.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- EAVLD 2024 - 7Italian journal of food safety · 2024Article
- Whole-Genome Sequencing-Based Confirmatory Methods on RT-qPCR Results for the Detection of Foodborne Viruses in Frozen Berries.Food and environmental virology · 2024Article
- Strain-level characterization of foodborne pathogens without culture enrichment for outbreak investigation using shotgun metagenomics facilitated with nanopore adaptive sampling.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Amplicon-Based High-Throughput Sequencing Method for Genotypic Characterization of Norovirus in Oysters.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this proof-of-concept study on food contaminated with norovirus, we investigated the feasibility of metagenomics as a new method to obtain the whole genome sequence of the virus and perform strain level characterization but also relate to human cases in order to resolve foodborne outbreaks. We tested several preparation methods to determine if a more open sequencing approach, i.e., shotgun metagenomics, or a more targeted approach, including hybrid capture, was the most appropriate. The genetic material was sequenced using Oxford Nanopore technologies with or without adaptive sampling, and the data were analyzed with an in-house bioinformatics workflow. We showed that a viral genome sequence could be obtained for phylogenetic analysis with shotgun metagenomics if the contamination load was sufficiently high or after hybrid capture for lower contamination. Relatedness to human cases goes well beyond the results obtained with the current qPCR methods. This workflow was also tested on a publicly available dataset of food spiked with norovirus and hepatitis A virus. This allowed us to prove that we could detect even fewer genome copies and two viruses present in a sample using shotgun metagenomics. We share the lessons learnt on the satisfactory and unsatisfactory results in an attempt to advance the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.