Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36359925›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Understanding the Performance of Plant Protein Concentrates as Partial Meat Substitutes in Hybrid Meat Emulsions.

Mirian Dos Santos, Daniela Almeida Vieira Fogaça da Rocha, Oigres Daniel Bernardinelli, Fernando Divino Oliveira Júnior, Diógenes Gomes de Sousa, Edvaldo Sabadini, Rosiane Lopes da Cunha, Marco Antonio Trindade, Marise Aparecida Rodrigues Pollonio

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mirian Dos SantosFaculdade de Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp), Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz, Campinas, 13083-862, SP, Brazil.
Daniela Almeida Vieira Fogaça da RochaInstituto de Química, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp), Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz, Campinas 13083-862, SP, Brazil.
Oigres Daniel BernardinelliDepartamento de Física, Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos 13565-905, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1606-1994
Fernando Divino Oliveira JúniorFaculdade de Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp), Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz, Campinas, 13083-862, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4944-0715
Diógenes Gomes de SousaFaculdade de Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp), Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz, Campinas, 13083-862, SP, Brazil.
Edvaldo SabadiniInstituto de Química, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp), Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz, Campinas 13083-862, SP, Brazil.
Rosiane Lopes da CunhaFaculdade de Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp), Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz, Campinas, 13083-862, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2228-5492
Marco Antonio TrindadeFaculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade de São Paulo, Avenida Duque de Caxias Norte 225, Jardim Elite, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.
Marise Aparecida Rodrigues PollonioFaculdade de Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp), Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz, Campinas, 13083-862, SP, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal de São Carlos · BR

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 131994/2017-4São Paulo Research Foundation 2019/27354-3São Paulo Research Foundation 2021/02990-4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hybrid meat products are an excellent strategy to incorporate plant proteins into traditional meat formulations considering recent market trends focusing on the partial reduction in red meat content. In this work, we evaluated the effects of different concentrated plant proteins (soy, pea, fava bean, rice, and sunflower) in partially replacing meat in meat emulsion model systems. Soy, pea, and sunflower proteins showed great compatibility with the meat matrix, giving excellent emulsion stability and a cohesive protein network with good fat distribution. Otherwise, adding rice and fava bean proteins resulted in poor emulsion stability. Color parameters were affected by the intrinsic color of plant proteins and due to the reduction in myoglobin content. Both viscoelastic moduli, G' and G″ decreased with the incorporation of plant proteins, especially for rice and fava bean. The temperature sweep showed that myosin denaturation was the dominant effect on the G' increase. The water mobility was affected by plant proteins and the proportion between immobilized and intermyofibrillar water was quite different among treatments, especially those with fava bean and rice proteins. In vitro protein digestibility was lower for hybrid meat emulsion elaborated with rice protein. It is concluded that soy, pea, and mainly sunflower proteins have suitable compatibility with the meat matrix in emulsified products.

Indexed as

functional properties of plant proteinsin vitro protein digestibilityreduced-meat productsrice proteinsunflower protein

Identifiers

PMID36359925
PMCPMC9657839
OpenAlexW4307263075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.