ReviewCells2022
Generation of Lens Progenitor Cells and Lentoid Bodies from Pluripotent Stem Cells: Novel Tools for Human Lens Development and Ocular Disease Etiology.
Review in Cells, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Mammalian Ocular Lens in Focus: Development, Anatomy, Physiology, Transparency, Biomechanics, and Age-related Challenges.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2026Review
- Personalized Models of Biological Barriers and Their Diseases: Recent Progress with Organs-On-Chips.Advanced biology · 2026Review
- Analysis of mouse lens morphological and proteomic abnormalities following deletion of the βB3-crystallin promoter.Experimental eye research · 2025Article
- Genetic Basis of Non-Syndromic Childhood Glaucoma Associated with Anterior Segment Dysgenesis: A Narrative Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Cellular Senescence in Health, Disease, and Lens Aging.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Intermediate filaments and their associated molecules.Journal of biomedical research · 2025Article
- Lens Regeneration: The Application of iSyTE and In Silico Approaches to Evaluate Gene Expression in Lens Organoids.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Biologically Relevant Laminin-511 Moderates the Derivation and Proliferation of Human Lens Epithelial Stem/Progenitor-Like Cells.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells towards lens epithelial stem cells based on three-dimensional bio-printed matrix.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Article
- The significance of growth shells in development of symmetry, transparency, and refraction of the human lens.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2024Review
- Article
- Review
- Advancements in Ocular Regenerative Therapies.Biology · 2023Review
- Minigene Splicing Assays and Long-Read Sequencing to Unravel Pathogenic Deep-Intronic Variants inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In vitro differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) into specialized tissues and organs represents a powerful approach to gain insight into those cellular and molecular mechanisms regulating human development. Although normal embryonic eye development is a complex process, generation of ocular organoids and specific ocular tissues from pluripotent stem cells has provided invaluable insights into the formation of lineage-committed progenitor cell populations, signal transduction pathways, and self-organization principles. This review provides a comprehensive summary of recent advances in generation of adenohypophyseal, olfactory, and lens placodes, lens progenitor cells and three-dimensional (3D) primitive lenses, "lentoid bodies", and "micro-lenses". These cells are produced alone or "community-grown" with other ocular tissues. Lentoid bodies/micro-lenses generated from human patients carrying mutations in crystallin genes demonstrate proof-of-principle that these cells are suitable for mechanistic studies of cataractogenesis. Taken together, current and emerging advanced in vitro differentiation methods pave the road to understand molecular mechanisms of cataract formation caused by the entire spectrum of mutations in DNA-binding regulatory genes, such as PAX6, SOX2, FOXE3, MAF, PITX3, and HSF4, individual crystallins, and other genes such as BFSP1, BFSP2, EPHA2, GJA3, GJA8, LIM2, MIP, and TDRD7 represented in human cataract patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.