Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36359756›Full record

ArticleCells2022

Biophysical Determinants and Constraints on Sperm Swimming Velocity.

Carl D Soulsbury, Stuart Humphries

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Known and Unknown About Female Reproductive Tract Mucus Rheological Properties.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Carl D SoulsburySchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Joseph Banks Laboratories, University of Lincoln, Green Lane, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8808-5210
Stuart HumphriesSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Joseph Banks Laboratories, University of Lincoln, Green Lane, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9766-6404

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last 50 years, sperm competition has become increasingly recognised as a potent evolutionary force shaping male ejaculate traits. One such trait is sperm swimming speed, with faster sperm associated with increased fertilisation success in some species. Consequently, sperm are often thought to have evolved to be longer in order to facilitate faster movement. However, despite the intrinsic appeal of this argument, sperm operate in a different biophysical environment than we are used to, and instead increasing length may not necessarily be associated with higher velocity. Here, we test four predictive models (

Indexed as

SemenSperm MotilityAnimalsBiological EvolutionFlagellaMaleSpermatozoabiophysicsejaculate traitsReynolds numberspermatozoasperm competitionsperm length

Identifiers

PMID36359756
PMCPMC9656961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.