Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36359696›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Grid-Based Clustering Using Boundary Detection.

Mingjing Du, Fuyu Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mingjing DuSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7701-9004
Fuyu WuSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 62006104Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions 20KJB520012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clustering can be divided into five categories: partitioning, hierarchical, model-based, density-based, and grid-based algorithms. Among them, grid-based clustering is highly efficient in handling spatial data. However, the traditional grid-based clustering algorithms still face many problems: (1) Parameter tuning: density thresholds are difficult to adjust; (2) Data challenge: clusters with overlapping regions and varying densities are not well handled. We propose a new grid-based clustering algorithm named GCBD that can solve the above problems. Firstly, the density estimation of nodes is defined using the standard grid structure. Secondly, GCBD uses an iterative boundary detection strategy to distinguish core nodes from boundary nodes. Finally, two clustering strategies are combined to group core nodes and assign boundary nodes. Experiments on 18 datasets demonstrate that the proposed algorithm outperforms 6 grid-based competitors.

Indexed as

boundary detectiondensity-based clusteringgrid-based clustering

Identifiers

PMID36359696
PMCPMC9688995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.