Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36359688›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Memory-Limited Partially Observable Stochastic Control and Its Mean-Field Control Approach.

Takehiro Tottori, Tetsuya J Kobayashi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Understanding Nash epidemics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Olfactory search with finite-state controllers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Takehiro TottoriDepartment of Mathematical Informatics, Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8654, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5141-261X
Tetsuya J KobayashiDepartment of Mathematical Informatics, Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8654, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8474-7942

Funding

Japan Science and Technology Agency JPMJCR2011Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 19H05799Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 21J20436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Control problems with incomplete information and memory limitation appear in many practical situations. Although partially observable stochastic control (POSC) is a conventional theoretical framework that considers the optimal control problem with incomplete information, it cannot consider memory limitation. Furthermore, POSC cannot be solved in practice except in special cases. In order to address these issues, we propose an alternative theoretical framework, memory-limited POSC (ML-POSC). ML-POSC directly considers memory limitation as well as incomplete information, and it can be solved in practice by employing the technique of mean-field control theory. ML-POSC can generalize the linear-quadratic-Gaussian (LQG) problem to include memory limitation. Because estimation and control are not clearly separated in the LQG problem with memory limitation, the Riccati equation is modified to the partially observable Riccati equation, which improves estimation as well as control. Furthermore, we demonstrate the effectiveness of ML-POSC for a non-LQG problem by comparing it with the local LQG approximation.

Indexed as

decision-makingincomplete informationmean-field controlmemory limitationoptimal controlstochastic control

Identifiers

PMID36359688
PMCPMC9689590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.