ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Dual-Energy Computed Tomography-Based Iodine Concentration Estimation for Evaluating Choroidal Malignant Melanoma Response to Treatment: Optimization and Primary Validation.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dual-Energy CT in Oncologic Imaging.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Contrast-enhanced imaging for choroidal malignant melanoma (CMM) is mostly limited to detecting metastatic tumors, possibly due to difficulties in fixing the eye position. We aimed to (1) validate the appropriateness of estimating iodine concentration based on dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for CMM and optimize the calculation parameters for estimation, and (2) perform a primary clinical validation by assessing the ability of this technique to show changes in CMM after charged-particle radiation therapy. The accuracy of the optimized estimate (eIC_optimized) was compared to an estimate obtained by commercial software (eIC_commercial) by determining the difference from the ground truth. Then, eIC_optimized, tumor volume, and CT values (80 kVp, 140 kVp, and synthesized 120 kVp) were measured at pre-treatment and 3 months and 1.5−2 years after treatment. The difference from the ground truth was significantly smaller in eIC_optimized than in eIC_commercial (p < 0.01). Tumor volume, CT values, and eIC_optimized all decreased significantly at 1.5−2 years after treatment, but only eIC_commercial showed a significant reduction at 3 months after treatment (p < 0.01). eIC_optimized can quantify contrast enhancement in primary CMM lesions and has high sensitivity for detecting the response to charged-particle radiation therapy, making it potentially useful for treatment monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.