Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36359525›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Scoping Review on the Multimodal Classification of Depression and Experimental Study on Existing Multimodal Models.

Umut Arioz, Urška Smrke, Nejc Plohl, Izidor Mlakar

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Umut AriozFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, The University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-6476-4494
Urška SmrkeFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, The University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0003-3516-0429
Nejc PlohlDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, The University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0001-9936-4039
Izidor MlakarFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, The University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-4910-1879

Funding

European Union 875406Slovenian Research Agency J5-3120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Depression is a prevalent comorbidity in patients with severe physical disorders, such as cancer, stroke, and coronary diseases. Although it can significantly impact the course of the primary disease, the signs of depression are often underestimated and overlooked. The aim of this paper was to review algorithms for the automatic, uniform, and multimodal classification of signs of depression from human conversations and to evaluate their accuracy. For the scoping review, the PRISMA guidelines for scoping reviews were followed. In the scoping review, the search yielded 1095 papers, out of which 20 papers (8.26%) included more than two modalities, and 3 of those papers provided codes. Within the scope of this review, supported vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and long short-term memory network (LSTM; with gated and non-gated recurrent units) models, as well as different combinations of features, were identified as the most widely researched techniques. We tested the models using the DAIC-WOZ dataset (original training dataset) and using the SymptomMedia dataset to further assess their reliability and dependency on the nature of the training datasets. The best performance was obtained by the LSTM with gated recurrent units (F1-score of 0.64 for the DAIC-WOZ dataset). However, with a drop to an F1-score of 0.56 for the SymptomMedia dataset, the method also appears to be the most data-dependent.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencemental healthmultimodal depression classificationreal-world datascoping review

Identifiers

PMID36359525
PMCPMC9689708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.