Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36359520›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Automated Artificial Intelligence-Based Assessment of Lower Limb Alignment Validated on Weight-Bearing Pre- and Postoperative Full-Leg Radiographs.

Felix Erne, Priyanka Grover, Marcel Dreischarf, Marie K Reumann, Dominik Saul, Tina Histing, Andreas K Nüssler, Fabian Springer, Carolin Scholl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Validation of a software-based torsional measurement method of the lower limb: A retrospective study.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Felix ErneSiegfried Weller Institute for Trauma Research, BG Unfallklinik Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0877-9018
Priyanka GroverRAYLYTIC GmbH, 04109 Leipzig, Germany.
Marcel DreischarfRAYLYTIC GmbH, 04109 Leipzig, Germany.
Marie K ReumannSiegfried Weller Institute for Trauma Research, BG Unfallklinik Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Dominik SaulDepartment for Traumatology and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Unfallklinik Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0673-3710
Tina HistingDepartment for Traumatology and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Unfallklinik Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Andreas K NüsslerSiegfried Weller Institute for Trauma Research, BG Unfallklinik Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Fabian SpringerDepartment of Radiology, BG Unfallklinik Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Carolin SchollRAYLYTIC GmbH, 04109 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0021-9435
BG Klinik Tübingen · DE

Funding

German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action ID: 01MK20003A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The assessment of the knee alignment using standing weight-bearing full-leg radiographs (FLR) is a standardized method. Determining the load-bearing axis of the leg requires time-consuming manual measurements. The aim of this study is to develop and validate a novel algorithm based on artificial intelligence (AI) for the automated assessment of lower limb alignment. In the first stage, a customized mask-RCNN model was trained to automatically detect and segment anatomical structures and implants in FLR. In the second stage, four region-specific neural network models (adaptations of UNet) were trained to automatically place anatomical landmarks. In the final stage, this information was used to automatically determine five key lower limb alignment angles. For the validation dataset, weight-bearing, antero-posterior FLR were captured preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. Preoperative images were measured by the operating orthopedic surgeon and an independent physician. Postoperative images were measured by the second rater only. The final validation dataset consisted of 95 preoperative and 105 postoperative FLR. The detection rate for the different angles ranged between 92.4% and 98.9%. Human vs. human inter-(ICCs: 0.85−0.99) and intra-rater (ICCs: 0.95−1.0) reliability analysis achieved significant agreement. The ICC-values of human vs. AI inter-rater reliability analysis ranged between 0.8 and 1.0 preoperatively and between 0.83 and 0.99 postoperatively (all p < 0.001). An independent and external validation of the proposed algorithm on pre- and postoperative FLR, with excellent reliability for human measurements, could be demonstrated. Hence, the algorithm might allow for the objective and time saving analysis of large datasets and support physicians in daily routine.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceautomatic analysisdeep learningfull-leglower limb alignmentX-ray

Identifiers

PMID36359520
PMCPMC9689840
OpenAlexW4308197876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.