Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36359468›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

A Logistic Regression Model for Biomechanical Risk Classification in Lifting Tasks.

Leandro Donisi, Giuseppe Cesarelli, Edda Capodaglio, Monica Panigazzi, Giovanni D'Addio, Mario Cesarelli, Francesco Amato

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05777304 (Wearable Sensors and Machine Learning), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05777304 completednot on this map

Wearable Sensors and Machine Learning: a Technological Approach to Biomechanical Risk Assessment in Lifting Tasks

TypeobservationalSponsorIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpARan2010 to 2022Enrolled41ConditionsWearable DevicesArmswearable device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leandro DonisiDepartment of Chemical, Materials and Production Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, 80125 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9746-2265
Giuseppe CesarelliDepartment of Chemical, Materials and Production Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, 80125 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8303-5900
Edda CapodaglioInstitute of Care and Scientific Research Maugeri, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Monica PanigazziInstitute of Care and Scientific Research Maugeri, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Giovanni D'AddioInstitute of Care and Scientific Research Maugeri, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Mario CesarelliInstitute of Care and Scientific Research Maugeri, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Francesco AmatoDepartment of information Technology and Electrical Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, 80125 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9053-3139
Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lifting is one of the most potentially harmful activities for work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs), due to exposure to biomechanical risk. Risk assessment for work activities that involve lifting loads can be performed through the NIOSH (National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health) method, and specifically the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation (RNLE). Aim of this work is to explore the feasibility of a logistic regression model fed with time and frequency domains features extracted from signals acquired through one inertial measurement unit (IMU) to classify risk classes associated with lifting activities according to the RNLE. Furthermore, an attempt was made to evaluate which are the most discriminating features relating to the risk classes, and to understand which inertial signals and which axis were the most representative. In a simplified scenario, where only two RNLE variables were altered during lifting tasks performed by 14 healthy adults, inertial signals (linear acceleration and angular velocity) acquired using one IMU placed on the subject's sternum during repeated rhythmic lifting tasks were automatically segmented to extract several features in the time and frequency domains. The logistic regression model fed with significant features showed good results to discriminate "risk" and "no risk" NIOSH classes with an accuracy, sensitivity and specificity equal to 82.8%, 84.8% and 80.9%, respectively. This preliminary work indicated that a logistic regression model-fed with specific inertial features extracted by signals acquired using a single IMU sensor placed on the sternum-is able to discriminate risk classes according to the RNLE in a simplified context, and therefore could be a valid tool to assess the biomechanical risk in an automatic way also in more complex conditions (e.g., real working scenarios).

Indexed as

biomechanical risk assessmentfeature extractionhealth monitoringinertial measurement unitliftingoccupational ergonomicsRevised NIOSH Lifting Equationstatistical learningwearable sensorswork-related musculoskeletal disorders

Identifiers

PMID36359468
PMCPMC9689567
OpenAlexW4307946155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.