Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36359447›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Incorporation of Tumor-Free Distance and Other Alternative Ultrasound Biomarkers into a Myometrial Invasion-Based Model Better Predicts Lymph Node Metastasis in Endometrial Cancer: Evidence and Future Prospects.

Marcin Liro, Marcin Śniadecki, Ewa Wycinka, Szymon Wojtylak, Michał Brzeziński, Joanna Jastrzębska, Dariusz Wydra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marcin LiroDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland.
Marcin ŚniadeckiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9587-0476
Ewa WycinkaDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Management, Gdańsk University, 80-309 Gdańsk, Poland.
Szymon WojtylakDepartment of Pathology, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland.
Michał BrzezińskiDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, PCK Marine Hospital in Gdynia, 81-519 Gdynia, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6733-3465
Joanna JastrzębskaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8820-8890
Dariusz WydraDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland.
Gdańsk Medical University · PLGdynia Maritime University · PLUniversity of Gdańsk · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myometrial invasion (MI) is a parameter currently used in transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) in endometrial cancer (EC) to determine local staging; however, without molecular diagnostics, it is insufficient for the selection of high-risk cases, i.e., those with a high risk of lymph node metastases (LNM). The study’s objective was to answer the question of which TVS markers, or their combination, reflecting the molecular changes in EC, can improve the prediction of LNM. Methods: The TVS examination was performed on 116 consecutive EC patients included in this prospective study. The results from the final histopathology were a reference standard. Univariate and multivariate logistic models of analyzed TVS biomarkers (tumor [T] size, T area [AREA], T volume [SPE-VOL], MI, T-free distance to serosa [TFD], endo-myometrial irregularity, [EMIR], cervical stromal involvement, CSI) were evaluated to assess the relative accuracy of the possible LNM predictors., Spline functions were applied to avoid a potential bias in assuming linear relations between LNM and continuous predictors. Calculations were made in R using libraries splines, glmulti, and pROC. Results: LNM was found in 20 out of the 116 (17%) patients. In univariate analysis, only uMI, EMIR, uCSI and uTFD were significant predictors of LNM. The accuracy was 0.707 (AUC 0.684, 95% CI 0.568−0.801) for uMI (p < 0.01), 0.672 (AUC 0.664, 95% CI 0.547−0.781) for EMIR (p < 0.01), 0.776 (AUC 0.647, 95% CI 0.529−0.765) for uCSI (p < 0.01), and 0.638 (AUC 0.683, 95% CI 0.563−0.803) for uTFD (p < 0.05). The cut-off value for uTFD was 5.2 mm. However, AREA and VOL revealed a significant relationship by nonlinear analysis as well. Among all possible multivariate models, the one comprising interactions of splines of uTFD with uMI and splines of SPE-VOL with uCSI showed the most usefulness. Accuracy was 0.802 (AUC 0.791, 95% CI 0.673−0.91) Conclusions: A combination of uTFD for patients with uMI > 50%, and SPE-VOL for patients with uCSI, allows for the most accurate prediction of LNM in EC, rather than uMI alone.

Indexed as

biomarkersendometrial cancerlymph nodesmetastasesmodelstagingultrasound

Identifiers

PMID36359447
PMCPMC9689828
OpenAlexW4307434394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.