ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Utility of Superb Microvascular Imaging in the Assessment of Foot Perfusion in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- A multi-parameter ultrasound prediction model for nutrition-associated skin failure in hospitalized elderly patients: a prospective cohort study protocol.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Evaluation of muscle microvascular perfusion in primary mitochondrial disease by contrast-enhanced ultrasound: Feasibility study.Therapeutic advances in rare diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
(1) Background: Although the ankle-brachial index (ABI) and skin perfusion pressure (SPP) are commonly used to evaluate the peripheral circulation in critical limb ischemia (CLI), they often cannot be performed on sore areas. We investigated the utility of superb microvascular imaging (SMI) for assessing foot perfusion in CLI patients. (2) Methods: We measured the SMI-based vascular index (SMI-VI) at six sites in the foot before and after endovascular treatment (EVT) in 50 patients with CLI who underwent EVT of the superficial femoral artery and compared the results with SPP values and the ABI. (3) Results: SMI visualized foot perfusion in all subjects in accordance with the angiosome, including the toe areas, while the ABI was unmeasurable in three patients on hemodialysis and SPP failed in four patients. SMI-VI values were significantly lower in the CLI group than in controls, and the plantar SMI-VI had the highest diagnostic performance for CLI (sensitivity 88.6%, specificity 95.6%). After EVT, the increase in the SMI-VI was positively correlated with the increase in SPP but not that in the ABI, implying that the SMI-VI reflects foot microcirculation. (4) Conclusions: SMI enables the visualization and quantification of foot microcirculation based on the angiosome. SMI has high utility as a tool for assessing foot perfusion in CLI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.