ArticleBiomedicines2022
A Deep Convolutional Neural Network for the Early Detection of Heart Disease.
Article in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Congenital heart disease diagnosis using machine learning: a systematic literature review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Toward Reliable Coronary Heart Disease Prediction: Integrating Multi-source Data with Ensemble Machine Learning.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Hybrid vision transformer framework for congenital heart disease diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Sustainable and interpretable heart disease prediction: a clinical decision support approach for biomedical healthcare applications.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Harris Hawks optimization based deep learning models for heart disease diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Accurately assessing congenital heart disease using artificial intelligence.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- HAWKFOG-an enhanced deep learning framework for the Fog-IoT environment.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Article
- Enhanced cardiovascular disease prediction through self-improved Aquila optimized feature selection in quantum neural network & LSTM model.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Reseek-Arrhythmia: Empirical Evaluation of ResNet Architecture for Detection of Arrhythmia.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A review of multi-omics data integration through deep learning approaches for disease diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart disease is one of the key contributors to human death. Each year, several people die due to this disease. According to the WHO, 17.9 million people die each year due to heart disease. With the various technologies and techniques developed for heart-disease detection, the use of image classification can further improve the results. Image classification is a significant matter of concern in modern times. It is one of the most basic jobs in pattern identification and computer vision, and refers to assigning one or more labels to images. Pattern identification from images has become easier by using machine learning, and deep learning has rendered it more precise than traditional image classification methods. This study aims to use a deep-learning approach using image classification for heart-disease detection. A deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) is currently the most popular classification technique for image recognition. The proposed model is evaluated on the public UCI heart-disease dataset comprising 1050 patients and 14 attributes. By gathering a set of directly obtainable features from the heart-disease dataset, we considered this feature vector to be input for a DCNN to discriminate whether an instance belongs to a healthy or cardiac disease class. To assess the performance of the proposed method, different performance metrics, namely, accuracy, precision, recall, and the F1 measure, were employed, and our model achieved validation accuracy of 91.7%. The experimental results indicate the effectiveness of the proposed approach in a real-world environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.