Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36359300›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2022

Transvenous Lead Extraction Procedure-Indications, Methods, and Complications.

Paul-Mihai Boarescu, Adela-Nicoleta Roşian, Ştefan Horia Roşian

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Practical Approaches to Transvenous Lead Extraction Procedures-Clinical Case Series.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paul-Mihai BoarescuDepartment of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Clinical Pharmacology, "Iuliu Haţieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca, Gheorghe Marinescu Street No. 23, 400337 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-6185-7129
Adela-Nicoleta Roşian"Niculae Stăncioiu" Heart Institute Cluj-Napoca, Calea Moților Street No. 19-21, 400001 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Ştefan Horia Roşian"Niculae Stăncioiu" Heart Institute Cluj-Napoca, Calea Moților Street No. 19-21, 400001 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-0570-0642

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) is a complex and technically challenging procedure useful in the management strategy for many complications related to the presence of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). The decision to perform lead extraction should take into consideration the clinical indication for the procedure, risks versus benefits, extractor and team experience, and also patient preference for the procedure. A variety of techniques can be used when performing TLE procedures, such as simple traction, traction devices, and various types of sheaths or snares. TLE is a procedure with a potentially high risk of complications that can be divided into major complications, which require rapid intervention, and minor complications, which are more frequent but are not life-threatening. The present review aims to highlight the indications, contraindications, methods, and complications of transvenous lead extraction procedures.

Indexed as

cardiac implantable electronic devicesclinical casestransvenous lead extraction

Identifiers

PMID36359300
PMCPMC9687878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.