Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36359137›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Clinical Scoring Systems in the Newborn Calf: An Overview.

Monica Probo, Maria Cristina Veronesi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Veterinary and animal science · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The effect of supplementing pre-weaning dairy calves' starter feed withJournal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Effect of Dead-CellAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Monica ProboDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via dell'università, 6-26900 Lodi, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7479-9869
Maria Cristina VeronesiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via dell'università, 6-26900 Lodi, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A scoring system is an instrument that enables the scorers, including farmers, technicians, and veterinarians, to adopt a systematic approach for diagnosis or monitoring, as it decreases bias and confounding and increases objectivity. Practically, it is a number assigned to a patient that correlates with a probability that a diagnosis can be confirmed or that a specific outcome will follow. This article examines the clinical scores designed or adapted to bovine medicine that aim to assess newborn calf viability and to diagnose and monitor neonatal calf diarrhea and respiratory diseases, helping the clinician promptly recognize calves needing medical assistance. Despite the large number of clinical scores described in the literature, these are still barely used in farm animal practice; possibly, the complexity of the scores and missing recommendations for intervention are reasons for their lack of popularity as well as the crosswise lack of consistency among scores designed for the same purpose. Further research is needed in this regard to increase scores validation and encourage their application in bovine calf neonatology.

Indexed as

APGARclinical scorediarrheanewborn calfrespiratory diseaseviability

Identifiers

PMID36359137
PMCPMC9658896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.